https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501 Application
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501 Application
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Digital Service Providers
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • CHANNEL PARTNERS ONLINE
 Channel Futures

Mobility


Who Owns the Netbook Trademark?

  • Written by The VAR Guy 1
  • December 28, 2008
Psion (the mobile device maker that eventually fell off a cliff) may wind up haunting netbook makers. Apparently, Psion Teklogix holds a trademark on the netbook term and is sending cease and desist letters to some folks.  The story first surfaced on jkOnTheRun, a blog that covers mobile devices.

Psion Netbook TrademarkPsion (the mobile device maker that eventually fell off a cliff) may wind up haunting netbook makers. Apparently, Psion Teklogix holds a trademark on the netbook term and is sending cease and desist letters to some folks.  The story first surfaced on jkOnTheRun, a blog that covers mobile devices. So what does that mean to major PC companies that market Netbook-braded products? Hmmm…

First, a little background: In the PC industry, low-cost sub-notebooks are increasingly called Netbooks by vendors, partners and bloggers (including The VAR Guy). Lenovo, for one,  recently introduced the IdeaPad S Series Netbooks. Intel uses the Netbook term frequently. Even Gartner, the IT research firm, embraced Netbook as a general term in its latest research about exploding demand for sub-notebooks. Netbooks are also well-known because many of the most popular devices come with Linux pre-installed, putting intense pressure on Microsoft’s Windows business.

Now, for the twist: Psion introduced the Netbook term in 1999, and allegedly has a trademark on the term. If true, high-tech companies may eventually have to negotiate with Psion for the rights to use the Netbook term.

Still, it’s a bit premature for The VAR Guy to toss around “what if” scenarios. Most high-tech firms have been closed for the holidays, and requests for comment from Psion, Intel and Lenovo have yet to be returned.

In the meantime, The VAR Guy will keep blogging away from his Netbook, er, sub-notebook.

The VAR Guy is updated multiple times daily. Don’t miss a single post. Subscribe to his newsletter, RSS and Twitter feed.

Tags: Cloud Service Providers Digital Service Providers MSPs VARs/SIs Mobility

Related


  • Depiction of a supply chain
    Full-Stack ICT Supply Chain Ownership Becoming a Thing of the Past
    To own or not to own? Supply chain model changes bring new players to the forefront.
  • Data center
    Netrality Data Centers Unveils Expanded Partner Program
    Data centers are an integral component of a hybrid architecture.
  • CP-Expo-Logo-1050x618 web
    Channel Partners Virtual 2021 Is Here — Take Advantage of the Amazing Content
    Some of the industry's most compelling speakers are poised to take the virtual stage at this week's event.
  • VDI
    IGEL Integrates Amazon WorkSpaces DaaS with Its Virtual Endpoint OS
    Also, the new Arm-based Raspberry Pi, co-developed by Citrix, IGEL and NComputing, is generally available.

12 comments

  1. Avatar Joey December 29, 2008 @ 3:07 am
    Reply

    I really don’t see a big deal in the name scheme of a genre of laptops. The term is being used as a description, not as a name for a specific product. If they want to protect their trademark on the term, they can do so, but the market wont be harmed. They will essentially create a new term for these type of laptops if need be.

  2. Avatar Draca December 29, 2008 @ 7:19 am
    Reply

    Frankly, the only company that has been pushing the “netbook” label for the Eee PC and its descendants was Intel. The rest of them adopted the term because Intel said so. The originator of the category, ASUStek, never used the term in their original marketing for the Eee PC. (They might now, but only because of its cultural currency.)

    I always thought that the term was a misnomer and misleading. I will not weep if the term “netbook” is abolished from the marketing of these mini laptops.

  3. Avatar Jacob December 29, 2008 @ 7:28 am
    Reply

    Interesting that Joey should define netbooks as “laptops”. That will bring GRiD Systems – which was sold to Tandy (RadioShack) who handed off manufacturing to AST and so on…. in to the equation.

    As far as I’m aware of the trademark “laptop” belonged to GRiD Systems and was used on their GRiD Compass /GRiDcase machines. (Have a look at GRiDcase 1550 and you’ll see where the Thinkpad consept originates from – including magnesium chassis, red markings and the famous mousebuttons).

    As far as I can remember there was a fierce battle between GRiD and IBM due to usage of the term “laptop” (possibly with compaq as well). Who owns the “laptop” trademark these days?

  4. Avatar JohnnyWadd December 29, 2008 @ 10:21 am
    Reply

    Who knows who invented the name or concept. The real question is who will be the first asshole to step up and start suing everyone else.

  5. Avatar The VAR Guy December 29, 2008 @ 1:44 pm
    Reply

    JohnnyWadd: This is a family site so watch the language… and regardless of what words you use your point is well-taken.

    Jacob: Hmmm. Interesting point regarding the Laptop trademark. Not sure who owns the trademark, but perhaps if The VAR Guy uses the term (laptop) often enough (laptop) the trademark owner (laptop) will come calling seeking (laptop) money.

  6. Avatar zumarraga December 29, 2008 @ 3:22 pm
    Reply

    it’s only a trade mark.

    We are not using the term ‘Netbook’ as a title of a model of our product (i.e. Zumarraga Netbook, a product of Zumarraga MFG). This one violates PSION’s trademark. But if PSION has gone out of business, ceased producing Netbook models, and exists only as an inactive entity in the market place, then there is no cause for the industry to reserve the trademark NETBOOK for PSION. There is no longer a product to attach the trademark name on.

    However, the term ‘netbook’ (small caps) does not violate the trade mark of PSION if used as a descriptive term. (ie, Zumarraga Zoombook, a hi speed, hdd-less netbook and Zgeneration product of Zumarraga MFG). In this example, Zumarraga is the enterprise entity, Zoombook is the presumed trademarked model of their production, and ‘netbook’ is merely a descriptive word of the type of product.

  7. Avatar Votre December 29, 2008 @ 4:13 pm
    Reply

    I’d really love it if the industry as a whole would just call PSION’s bluff and either say “nice try – come sue us”, or simply tell them to “piss off” and name this device something else.

    Besides, it’s pretty obvious some “intellectual property litigation shark” is behind this rather than PSION itself since PSION has been gone for years…

  8. Avatar JP December 29, 2008 @ 4:20 pm
    Reply

    of course if the US Government’s windows servers actually worked, you could search for the trademark owner. Ah…my taxes at work. Sure hope Obama eliminates this unnecessary spending!

  9. Avatar Scott December 29, 2008 @ 5:38 pm
    Reply

    If a netbook as we know them now has to be called a MID or some other name, PSION still loses in the market. And if PSION makes a great netbook as we know them now and participates in a market larger than they could have ever created with their prior devices, PSION and the market win.

    So they can try to get minor revenue by licensing a name that isn’t really needed — netbook is used descriptively far more than it is used in any product names — or they can invent a better netbook and get major revenue from participating in an exploding market. I vote for B, particularly as I’d bet the market will change the netbook term before ever giving PSION a penny in licensing.

  10. Avatar The VAR Guy December 29, 2008 @ 11:49 pm
    Reply

    Scott: The VAR Guy agrees… he doesn’t expect anyone to pay a dime to Psion for the rights to tne Netbook name…

  11. Avatar Darryl December 30, 2008 @ 1:28 pm
    Reply

    Look at it another way, what would Linus Torvolds do if the ford motor company producted a car called the FORD-LINUX ?

    or a toaster ? its a registered tradmark, its owned by a person or company (Linus). and by law the only way for the owner of a trade mark can keep it is if they work to protect it. So PSION has to send orders, and did the other companies not check if NETBOOK was registered or did not seek to register it themselves before using it, its about time some start to pay for their stupidity.

    (instead of being rewarded for it, and bailed out) !

  12. Avatar Tom Mann December 30, 2008 @ 2:00 pm
    Reply

    @Darryl,

    It was previously mentioned, if a company called their laptop ‘blah netbook’ it’s part of the title and under scrutiny. However as a descriptive term it is not enforcable.

    Think ford as in water crossing, vs Ford Model T…

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Juniper Networks Rolls Out Paragon Automation for 5G, Multicloud
  • CEO Benioff Touts Salesforce Customer 360 Work-From-Anywhere Capabilities
  • Cisco Second Quarter: Profit Slips, Revenue Flat
  • How SolarWinds' Massive Hack Upended Cybersecurity

Galleries

View all

From The Second City: How to Use Improv as a Business Tool

March 3, 2021

Industry Perspectives

View all

5 Ways XDR Can Improve Operational Efficiency for MSPs

March 4, 2021

Multi-Cloud: Strategy or Inevitable Outcome? (or both?)

March 3, 2021

Backup Vulnerability: 4 Targets Hackers Might Utilize to Infiltrate Your Backup Solution

March 2, 2021

Webinars

View all

A Partner’s Perspective on Channel Success in 2021

March 23, 2021

XDR and Why it Matters to MSPs

March 24, 2021

Top Security Trends Impacting Technology Security Providers In 2021

March 25, 2021

White Papers

View all

Why Fortinet for my MSSP?

March 2, 2021

Small and Mid-Size Business Security: 4 Steps to Success

March 2, 2021

How SMBs Can Secure Endpoints and Remote Workers for the Long Haul

March 2, 2021

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

November 1, 2021 - November 4, 2021

Videos and Fastchats

View all

FASTCHAT: How SOAR Eliminates Security Challenges and Elevates Service Provider Revenues

January 6, 2021

Happy Holidays from Channel Partners & Channel Futures!

December 21, 2020

FASTCHAT: How Old, Unpatched Technologies Are Creating New Security Threats for MSPs and Their Customers

December 3, 2020

Twitter

ChannelFutures

Our latest #Cybersecurity Roundup highlights #CPVirtual, @Huntresslabs, @Entrust_Corp and @InsightEnt.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 5, 2021
ChannelFutures

RT @Channel_Expo: A HUGE thank you to our amazing #CPVirtual sponsors and exhibitors! 👏 @ATTBusiness @DellTech @8x8 @lumentechco @telarus @…

March 5, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@okta acquiring rival @auth0 in $6.5 billion all-stock transaction. #security dlvr.it/Rtzwdp https://t.co/4LvHCJuwsR

March 4, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@MicrosoftTeams features are coming to @MSFTDynamics365, the company announced at @MS_Ignite. #MicrosoftIgnite… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 4, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@PreciselyData acquired by Clearlake Capital, @TAAssociates. #digitaltransformation dlvr.it/RtzbKg https://t.co/1rNYnTScxq

March 4, 2021
ChannelFutures

Thanks for attending #CPVirtual. Here's a Day 3 wrap and a look ahead to #CPExpo Homecoming in November!… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 4, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@Veeam announces six annual Impact Partner Awards, with @SHI_Intl, @LogicalisUS, more. #cloud… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 4, 2021
ChannelFutures

#XDR can improve operational efficiency for #MSPs. @TrendMicro #security #endpoint #AI #threatintelligence… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 4, 2021

MSSP Insider

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Channel Partners Online

Want more? Find more channel news and analysis on our sister site, Channel Partners.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Online
  • Channel Partners Events
  • MSP 501
  • MSSP Insider
  • IoT World Today
  • Webhostingtalk

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X