https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • MSP 501 Information Center
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • MSP 501 Information Center
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


The Questions

  • Written by Channel
  • February 28, 1998

Posted: 03/1998

California Questions Telcos on Third-Party Verification

By Larry Leikin

The California Public Utilities Commission (CPUC), in an attempt to solve the problem
of slamming, has ordered that every interexchange carrier (IXC), competitive local
exchange carrier (CLEC) and incumbent LEC (ILEC) respond to a 21-question survey of
verification procedures and primary interexchange carrier (PIC) dispute experience. All
carriers certified in California are required to respond by March 9, regardless of whether
third-party verification (TPV) requirements apply to them or not.

The Questions

Here are the important questions in the audit:

  • Does your firm solicit residential customers?
  • If yes, do you have an independent third-party verifier?
  • When did you implement third party verification?
  • What are the name, address, and telephone number of the verifier?
  • Is the verifier in any way affiliated with your firm?
  • Does the verifier operate from facilities physically separate from your firm?
  • Are the verification agents compensated by (a) hourly wage (b) salary (c) commission?
  • If the verification agents are compensated by commission, please state the basis of that
    commission.
  • Please provide transcripts of the first five verifications obtained in August 1997.
  • Does your firm solicit customers by (a) door-to-door sales agents (b) telemarketers (c)
    direct mail (d) general advertising?
  • If your firm has used different means of soliciting customers, what is your PIC dispute
    rate for each type of solicitation?
  • Does your firm accept authorization to transfer from anyone other the subscriber?
  • How does your firm confirm that the subscriber is authorizing the change in service?
  • Does your firm solicit business customers?
  • Do you verify business customer transfers? If so, how?
  • What is your firm’s practice for handling a customer transfer that has been disputed by
    the customer?
  • What was your average monthly PIC dispute rate for specific period 1/1/97 to 12/31/97?
  • What was your average monthly PIC dispute rate for 1/1/96 to 12/31/96?
  • What is your practice with regard to employees or sales agents that do not comply with
    the rules for customer authorization? What information do you use to ascertain whether an
    employee or sales agent is not in compliance?

The CPUC plans to do two things with the results of the audit: (1) it wants to
determine the level of compliance with the law that virtually every residential order be
verified through TPV; and (2) it is looking for data that can help gauge the effectiveness
of the TPV requirements and, possibly, lead to new ways to stop slamming.

Whether a company sells in California or not, this is an important development. It’s
the first time VoiceLog LLC knows of wherein a regulatory body is trying to gather a
comprehensive set of data on slamming. Also, since California has one of the higher
profiles among state regulators, it would not be surprising if other states borrowed from
this approach.

To clarify the questionnaire somewhat, VoiceLog interviewed some people at the CPUC and
got the inside scoop on the audit. Here are some of the high points:

  • If a company doesn’t sell residential business, it still needs to respond to the audit.
    However, its answers can be brief and it needs only answer the questions that are
    specifically relevant. The company can even answer together with other carriers, if all
    the answers are the same.
  • A company doesn’t need to hire a lawyer or put together an elaborate response. We were
    told that the "easiest, least expensive response that was clear and
    understandable" would be sufficient.
  • At this point, the CPUC has no plans to verify the data that is provided. Companies
    should be careful, however. The CPUC could easily develop plans to verify the data in a
    number of different ways, and there are serious risks associated with a false report.
  • It’s a good idea for a company to explain its answers if it is concerned about
    ambiguities. For example, question 9 asks about compensation for verification reps, but
    only provides three choices: hourly wage, salary and commission. Since most verification
    companies charge by the transaction or by the minute–and most clients don’t know how the
    agents themselves are paid–we suggest that a company provides both how the company is
    paid and how the agents are paid (if it knows).

The key to question 9, by the way, is not to pay on commission, whether it is
called a commission or not. Basically, the payment should not depend on whether the sale
was declared good or bad. Per transaction or per minute payments are OK–they just weren’t
included among the answers offered.

  • Questions 13, 19 and 20 all relate to PIC dispute rate, and the CPUC really wants those
    questions answered. We were told that evasive answers would "raise eyebrows" and
    result in "enhanced regulatory scrutiny." If a company doesn’t track dispute
    rates itself, we were told that the data is available from the LECs, which measure
    disputes as a percentage of customer transfers. If a company prefers, it can use a
    different measure, but it should explain the type of measurement that it uses and keep it
    internally consistent from question to question.

The point of questions 19 and 20, by the way, is to compare PIC disputes before the TPV
requirement and after that requirement. While we do not believe the CPUC will ignore
company-to-company dispute rate comparisons, this is not supposed to be the main point of
the questions. That’s why it is more important that the method be consistent from
year-to-year than from company-to-company.

If a company wants to earn some brownie points with the CPUC, it can make suggestions
about ways to reduce slamming. The people we talked to are especially concerned with
identifying new ways to eliminate slamming and indicated that they would be receptive to
any and all constructive ideas.

Companies needing more information can check out VoiceLog’s Internet site at
www.voicelog.com, which has the full survey as well as additional tips.

Larry Leikin is president of VoiceLog LLC, based in Charlotte, N.C., a major
provider of automated third-party verification services. He can be reached at (703)
356-1325.

Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Most Recent


  • Josh Stamer
    Images: D&H Distributing Mid-Atlantic Thread Event Featuring Intel, Lenovo
    The distributor also focused on digital transformation, SMB devices and more.
  • Microsoft Teams on different devices
    8x8 Mobilizes Microsoft Gold Partners Around New Channel Program
    The program leverages 8x8 Voice for Microsoft Teams, which supports more than 200,000 Teams users worldwide.
  • M&A
    Cloudli Buys ConnectMeVoice, Expands U.S. Reach
    ConnectMeVoice processes more than 12 million calls each month.
  • Digital handshake
    New Supplier Agreements: Upstack Signs CallTower, Avant Adds Netacea
    Avant expanded its cybersecurity portfolio, while Upstack formed another direct vendor agreement.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Sign a Contract
    Unisys Adds Managed UCaaS with $153 Million Unify Square Acquisition
  • Fortune 500 2021 logo
    AT&T, Microsoft, Verizon, More Tech, Telco Companies Make Latest Fortune 500
  • Telephone poles and lines
    Granite Buys Epik: Score One for Legacy Telecom
  • New
    Martello Technologies Group Targets MSPs, VARs with New Partner Program

Upcoming Events

View all

MSP Summit

September 13, 2022 - September 16, 2022

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

May 1, 2023 - May 4, 2023

Galleries

View all

8 Channel People Making Waves This Week at Splunk, Telarus, More

June 24, 2022

Human Casualties from Cybercrime, More Zero Trust Among Gartner Cybersecurity Predictions

June 24, 2022

Images: D&H Distributing Mid-Atlantic Thread Event Featuring Intel, Lenovo

June 24, 2022

Industry Perspectives

View all

Why MSPs are Attractive Cyberattack Targets

June 24, 2022

IT Partner Programs Must Evolve to Meet Market Demands

June 21, 2022

How Your Organization Can Benefit from the NIST Cybersecurity Framework

June 20, 2022

Webinars

View all

VEP Platform for Delivery of uCPE, SD-WAN and SASE

June 29, 2022

The Digital Worker: How to Empower Customers with a Flexible, Scalable VDI Solution to Enable Remote Work

June 30, 2022

Growing Partner Revenue and Customer Satisfaction with Power Management Services

June 23, 2022

White Papers

View all

Work Goes Remote – (and Other Top ITOps Trends)

May 25, 2022

The New Bottom Line: How MSPs Can Meet the Healthcare Crisis While Evolving Their Businesses

April 19, 2022

How to build a Security Operations Center (on a budget)

April 4, 2022

Channel Futures TV

View all

AT&T, Microsoft, Cisco, ThreatLocker on Unlocking Partner Potential

Agents Share ‘Secrets,’ Industry Opportunity

May 11, 2022

Vonage Addresses Potential Partner Opportunity via Acquisition by Ericsson

May 5, 2022

Lumen Technologies ‘Built for Growth and Scale’

May 4, 2022

Twitter

ChannelFutures

Channel people making waves this week include: @garylsteele, @fredvoccola, @kbarday, @stephenorban, @gabekker,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@Zendesk being acquired by group of global investors, taking the #CRM provider private. dlvr.it/SSnpwZ https://t.co/jaZdeqxoU3

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@Broadcom is planning @Vmware closing, promises "open mind"-- will draw on lessons of @CAinc and @symantec… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@Gartner_inc lists 8 #cybersecurity predictions, including more human casualties from #cyberattacks.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

Is your company a prime target for cyberattacks? Here's what MSPs need to know. @BarracudaMSP #cyberattacks… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

A huge round of applause 👏 to our 2022 top ten managed service providers from around the world as named on the Chan… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

RT @MSP_Summit: Early Bird pass prices for Channel Partners Leadership Summit, MSP Summit, & Women's Leadership Summit end at 11:59 p.m. ES…

June 24, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@dsm_IT is now the third acquisition by @thrivenetworks in Florida in the last six months. dlvr.it/SSmxQn https://t.co/cswaMztP6o

June 24, 2022

MSP 501

The industry's largest and most comprehensive partner awards program.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X