https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2020 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2020 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Digital Service Providers
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • CHANNEL PARTNERS ONLINE
 Channel Futures

Open Source


Test-driving Chrome for Ubuntu

  • Written by Christopher Tozzi
  • June 7, 2009

With an alpha version of Google’s Chrome web browser recently released, I’ve been using it on Ubuntu for a few days.   Below are some thoughts on the new browser and its ability to improve the Ubuntu experience.

Before delving into an evaluation of Chrome for Linux, however, I should point out that the version I tested (which I installed using the 32-bit Debian package available here) was very explicitly advertised as unstable–so much so that a popup window appeared warning me to expect strange behavior the first time I launched the browser.  For this reason, I’ve assumed that the annoying bugs I’ve encountered in Chrome over the last few days will be fixed in due time, and haven’t mentioned them below.

I should also make clear that my chief basis of comparison for my Chrome experience is Firefox 3, which I’ve used for the last several years, and which is the default browser in modern releases of Ubuntu.

With that out of the way, here’s a run-down of what I liked and disliked in Chrome running on Ubuntu:

The Good

  1. speed – even in its alpha version, Chrome renders pages much faster than Firefox.  This is especially true of sites that rely heavily on JavaScript, like the WordPress composer utility.  No longer having to cringe every time I open a script-intensive web page is a definite plus.
  2. simplified interface – Firefox’s interface is not bad, but Chrome raises the bar by removing extraneous menus by default in order to maximize the display area of web pages.  I first found this frustrating, but quickly realized that I can get along very well without Firefox’s extensive menu.  Chrome’s web-history and download-management interfaces, which are rendered as an ordinary web page in their own tabs, are also more convenient than the Firefox equivalents.
  3. faster  ‘awesome bar’ – the  awesome bar in Firefox 3 is a great resource for locating web pages quickly, but its tendency to lock up for a few seconds while trying to process a query can be frustrating.  I have yet to experience equivalent behavior with Chrome’s implementation of the awesome bar.  Perhaps I simply haven’t acquired a large enough web history to bog the utility down, but given Chrome’s focus on efficiency, I’m hoping that its awesome bar will indeed prove as zippy as the rest of the application.
  4. resource management – not surprisingly given the observations above, Chrome uses substantially fewer resources overall than Firefox.  With the same pages open in both browsers for the same amount of time, top reported the following for Chrome and Firefox:

top output for Firefox and Chrome

Chrome’s CPU usage exceeded Firefox’s occasionally, but in general, Chrome proved a much more efficient browser.  I especially appreciate its efficiency on my tired Pentium IV laptop, which has precious few megabytes of RAM and CPU cycles to spare.

The Bad

  1. UI integration – although it’s written using the Gnome GIMP toolkit, which should make it fit seamlessly into Gnome, Chrome looks out of place on my desktop.  I wouldn’t mention this if the Chrome developers hadn’t initially complained loudly about the lack of UI consistency on Linux, and reluctantly settled on GTK+ as the basis for their port.  While I’m sure the final product can be made to integrate cleanly into the Ubuntu desktop without much trouble, I was surprised that the alpha release looked more like something out of KDE than Gnome.
  2. default search engine – unsurprisingly, Chrome’s built-in search engine defaults to Google.  In the Windows version, this can be changed either during installation or by right-clicking in the address bar.  Not so in Linux–if you prefer a different search engine, you’re apparently out of luck.  Perhaps this will be addressed as Chrome’s Linux port matures, but if not, Google can expect a lot of flak from Ubuntu users complaining about their freedom of choice being denied.

Summary

Overall, I’m impressed with Chrome so far.  Its tiny resource footprint is likely to score big points with Linux geeks who like their machines to run as efficiently as possible, and with users seeking a more responsive browser than the mainstream offerings.  The current lack of integration into Gnome and the inability to change search engines (not to mention most other preferences) is discouraging, but we should spare final judgment on these issues until Chrome’s Linux port becomes stable.

Follow WorksWithU via Identi.ca, Twitter and RSS (available now) and our newsletter (coming soon).

Tags: Cloud Service Providers Digital Service Providers MSPs VARs/SIs Mobility Open Source

Related


  • Black History Month
    Black History Month: Celebrating Tech Pioneers
    From the 19th century to present day, their accomplishments are remarkable.
  • 2021 Channel Influencer Awards
    Spoiler alert: COVID-19 is not the Channel Influencer of the Year.
  • Automation
    Juniper Networks Rolls Out Paragon Automation for 5G, Multicloud
    The portfolio simplifies user experiences for complex 5G and multicloud services.
  • Telecommuter with Kid
    CEO Benioff Touts Salesforce Customer 360 Work-From-Anywhere Capabilities
    Salesforce expects to reach more than $25.5 billion in revenue this year.

17 comments

  1. Avatar sam June 8, 2009 @ 7:30 am
    Reply

    GTK+ is not the “Gnome toolkit” – it is the GIMP Toolkit.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/GTK%2B

  2. Avatar Leo June 8, 2009 @ 9:16 am
    Reply

    @Christopher: thanks for the report. Has anyone found a Linux Chrome roadmap? I am wondering when is golden expected.

    Also: I wonder why they haven’t chosen Qt for portability (like Opera did).

  3. Avatar Tim Fountain June 8, 2009 @ 9:47 am
    Reply

    Did you notice any oddities in the font rendering? I would expect fonts to look the same as Firefox, but they did look a little off. Kinda like they do in KDE apps under Gnome.

  4. Avatar dragonbite June 8, 2009 @ 9:48 am
    Reply

    When Chrome first came out, there was the rumor about it phoning home (to Google) about surfing activities.

    Has this been disproved, or disabled?

  5. Avatar Leo June 8, 2009 @ 10:32 am
    Reply

    @dragonbite: Chrome is based on open source chromium, so we should be safe unless they add prop bits on top. Anyone knows if the source of Chrome itself is also distributed?

    http://code.google.com/p/chromium/wiki/LinuxBuildInstructions

  6. Avatar Mike Rooney June 8, 2009 @ 11:51 am
    Reply

    I’ve been testing it as well, and I think you’ve perhaps made a mistake when comparing memory usage. In Chrome, each tab gets its own process, so I think you were looking at only the tab with the highest memory, or perhaps chrome itself. For me, I get a process for each tab, so you’d need to add them all up.

  7. Avatar Christopher Tozzi June 8, 2009 @ 12:46 pm
    Reply

    Sam: my mistake, fixed. Thanks for calling attention to it.

    Leo: I’m not aware of any target date for the stable release of Chrome for Linux. The developers seem to be intentionally quiet about it.

    The Chrome source is supposed to be available at http://src.chromium.org/viewvc/chrome/, but I’m not positive whether that includes everything that was compiled in the .deb installer.

    Tim: fonts actually look fine for me, although I didn’t do an exhaustive text. I would also expect rendering issues to be worked out by the time the browser is officially released.

    dragonbite: as Leo points out, since the browser is open-source, it’s ostensibly more secure. That said, there are some concerns about privacy regarding the EULA of the Windows version (e.g., http://doanmba.wordpress.com/2008/09/04/chrome-vs-chromium-review-continued/ ); whether the same EULA will be used for Linux remains unclear.

    Mike: interesting. I see a different process for each window, but not for each tab. Are you using the same build of Chrome as me? I’ll look into this more and update the post if I discover that my numbers were wrong.

  8. Avatar Leo June 8, 2009 @ 3:12 pm
    Reply

    I would actually love to have each tab be its own process, these days multicore processors are more and more ubiquitous (and the tendency is to have more and more). If you are running in legacy software, chances are you won’t keep 15 tabs open at the same time anyway 🙂

  9. Avatar Leo June 8, 2009 @ 3:12 pm
    Reply

    * errata: I meant to say legacy _hardware_

  10. Avatar [QuickLook] Test di Chrome su Ubuntu laquo; Apamea #8211; Ju June 8, 2009 @ 8:47 pm
    Reply

    […] Leggi l#8217;originale#8230; Taggato con:chrome, epiphany, firefox, google, safari, safari 4, webkit ancora nessun commento laquo; Frattura parcellare, calcetto enbsp;blog […]

  11. Avatar Links 09/06/2009: AbiWord v2.7.3 Released, China Spying Obli June 9, 2009 @ 4:14 am
    Reply

    […] Test-driving Chrome for Ubuntu Overall, I’m impressed with Chrome so far. Its tiny resource footprint is likely to score big points with Linux geeks who like their machines to run as efficiently as possible, and with users seeking a more responsive browser than the mainstream offerings. The current lack of integration into Gnome and the inability to change search engines (not to mention most other preferences) is discouraging, but we should spare final judgement on these issues until Chrome’s Linux port becomes stable. […]

  12. Avatar Leo June 9, 2009 @ 9:11 am
    Reply

    Sorry if this is a silly question, but could someone explain to me what posts #10 and #11 are about? Every once in a while I see posts like these … thanks!

  13. Avatar Chad June 9, 2009 @ 1:31 pm
    Reply

    Those are “backtracks” that get added when someone posts on their site or blog linking to this article.

  14. Avatar Leo June 9, 2009 @ 2:54 pm
    Reply

    @Chad: ah, thanks a lot! It would be nice if these backtracks were links that one could click and see the original page they are coming from.

  15. Avatar jaklumen June 10, 2009 @ 7:07 am
    Reply

    Well, um, I would go ahead and use “developer channel build”. I’ve been following this since the early alpha stages– things sat for a while, and then the updates started pouring in a few months ago.

    I haven’t been actively using it, but have been patiently waiting for the most part. I installed CrossOver’s port of Chromium from Windows, and, well, compared to the awful Windows 95/2000 UI it’s saddled with, I can be far more patient for this UI to be fully integrated to Gnome. I already use (and have used) GTK+ for a few things and so it doesn’t appear that alien to me. The only reason why I installed CrossOver’s port was my Windows friends were buzzing on and on about Chrome, but again, I can wait.

  16. Avatar Stephen Blackstone February 19, 2010 @ 6:12 pm
    Reply

    To fix the fonts (as mentioned above):

    Install MS Fonts:

    …sudo apt-get install msttfonts

    and then update your cache:

    …sudo fc-cache -f -v

  17. Avatar ddluss May 7, 2010 @ 12:42 pm
    Reply

    I just installed chrome 5.0375 on ubuntu 9.1 and it did ask me if I wanted to change the homepage and also it asked if I would like to phone home to google to provide crash reports etc. It gave me the option. They must have heard your opinions:)
    I like it, it works great! only thing I miss from the fox is the inline search with the / key 🙁 o well, I think I’ll live.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • IBM’s Hybrid Cloud Build Team Helps Partners ‘Like Never Before’
  • Linux Security Provider Capsule8 Rolls Out First Partner Program
  • EMC, Cisco Vet Named SoftIron Channel Chief
  • Dell Partners Get New 2021 Program, More Access to VMware

Galleries

View all

Threat Protection Vendors: Why MSSPs Have to Ramp Up Efforts Right Now

February 23, 2021

Industry Perspectives

View all

SASE: The Key to Mitigating Business Transformation Risk

February 22, 2021

Public Sector IT Funding Outlook for 2021–and What It Means for Our Reseller Partners

February 18, 2021

MSPs: Grow the Business with Marketing (While Focusing on What You Do Best)

February 17, 2021

Webinars

View all

XDR and Why it Matters to MSPs

March 24, 2021

Top Security Trends Impacting Technology Security Providers In 2021

March 25, 2021

In Case of Emergency: The Importance of Proactive Critical Event Management

February 23, 2021
  • 1

White Papers

View all

Kaspersky Endpoint Detection and Response Optimum

February 19, 2021

Product Brief: Kaseya VSA Integrated Workflows with BMS and IT Glue

January 26, 2021

Why Subscription Business Model

January 15, 2021

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Virtual

March 2, 2021 - March 4, 2021

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

November 1, 2021 - November 4, 2021

Videos and Fastchats

View all

FASTCHAT: How SOAR Eliminates Security Challenges and Elevates Service Provider Revenues

January 6, 2021

Happy Holidays from Channel Partners & Channel Futures!

December 21, 2020

FASTCHAT: How Old, Unpatched Technologies Are Creating New Security Threats for MSPs and Their Customers

December 3, 2020

Twitter

ChannelFutures

.@AteraCloud receives $25 million investment to help more #MSPs, IT pros. dlvr.it/RtPbBG https://t.co/UxHqhrUKgx

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@Infoblox rolls out new #Cloud Specialization program to increase partners' #SaaS sales. dlvr.it/RtPb7f https://t.co/CmZTwYiv1u

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

RT @Channel_Expo: ⏱️ Time is ticking to save on your pass to #CPVirtual next week...View all pass options and secure your virtual seat by F…

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

The new @Commvault #EMEA channel exec will focus attention on alliances, cloud and simplifying and expanding partne… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

#NYC #MSP @Electric_AI receives $40 million in C-Series investment from VC firm @GreenspringVC.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@rev_io_hq says the #backoffice grows in importance as more people work from home. dlvr.it/RtNLjd https://t.co/YZEVnm3KVk

February 24, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@KaseyaCorp acquires @rocketcyber, beefs up #cybersecurity for MSPs. dlvr.it/RtLQQ7 https://t.co/GXkDVhoNw5

February 23, 2021
ChannelFutures

Continuing #digitaltransformation for partners helps unlock #aaS and sales, says @GeorgeHope216.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 23, 2021

MSSP Insider

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Channel Partners Online

Want more? Find more channel news and analysis on our sister site, Channel Partners.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Online
  • Channel Partners Events
  • MSP 501
  • MSSP Insider
  • IoT World Today
  • Webhostingtalk

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X