https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2020 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • Analytics
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Cloud
    • Data Centers
    • Desktop
    • IoT
    • Mobility
    • Networking
    • Open Source
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Virtualization
    • Voice/Connectivity
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Best Practices
    • Business Models
    • Channel 101
    • Channel Programs
    • Channel Research
    • Digital Transformation
    • Diversity & Inclusion
    • Leadership
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Specialty Practices
  • MSSP Insider
    • Back
    • Business of Security
    • Cloud and Edge
    • Endpoint
    • Network
    • People and Careers
    • Training and Policies
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Our Sponsors
    • From the Industry
    • Content Resources
    • COVID-19 Partner Help
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Reports
    • Videos
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • EMEA
  • Awards
    • Back
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • 2020 MSP 501
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Partners Evolution
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
  • Channel Mentor
    • Back
    • Channel Market Intelligence
    • Channel Educational Series
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Digital Service Providers
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • CHANNEL PARTNERS ONLINE
 Channel Futures

Open Source


Google Makes Moves to Close Android’s Open Relationships

  • Written by Dave Courbanou 1
  • April 4, 2011
Google has reached out to major carriers of Android phones and asked them to stop tweaking the Android software. The company is also ceasing early access to the latest Android release, implementing a new approval process for carriers and developers. Read on for the details and perspective on what is turning into a bloody mobile device war ...

Google has reached out to major carriers of Android phones and asked them to stop tweaking the Android software. The company is also ceasing early access to the latest Android release, implementing a new approval process for carriers and developers. Read on for the details and perspective on what is turning into a bloody mobile device war …

A tip of the hat goes to Bloomberg Businessweek for breaking the story, which alleges that Andy Rubin, the head of Google’s Android group, will be the arbiter of all things Android when it comes to disseminating code to big-name vendors. What’s more, there will be no more partnerships “formed outside of Google’s purview.” Sounds like some real cracking down coming from the big brand of openness.

But why? Android initially was alluring because it was “open source.” The promise was that carriers, manufacturers and software development companies could essentially have a field day building on top of Android, instead of building something from the ground up. But in a January 2011 post, I suggested that level of ‘openness’ would essentially create the opposite effect, closing out users as carriers and companies opt to shut off features they deem ‘too open.’ I argued that these companies loved Android for all the opposite reasons users did.

Google has apparently become unnerved by that level of ‘customization.’ In an effort to reign in the free-for-all, Google has found the need to become more discriminating. For good cause, too. I’ve seen too many bad Android devices go out the door with Google’s name on them. That’s bad for consumers and bad for Google’s brand. On the other hand, companies that legitimately want to create Android products, but aren’t part of Google’s inner circle of early code releases, often get shafted when it comes to shipping products with the latest and greatest. Dell has been one such company, evident by its release of the Dell Streak running Android 1.6, already far outdated. This is a problem Google has essentially created for itself. So how can Google fix it?

According to Google’s John Lagerling, director of global Android partnerships at Google, Android needs to reach a “common denominator” experience, and after all the bugs are squashed and the dust is settled, then “the customization can begin.” This explains Google’s delay to release the tablet version of Android — Honeycomb — to the public.

Bloomberg’s bottom line is that Android is still open, just more policed, but I see this as an inevitable trend.

Google, regardless of whether it wants to admit it, really does want a consistent user experience in its operating system. In some small way, yes, that closes Android down. Android, for lack of a better term, is Google’s baby. That doesn’t mean other companies can’t take care of it correctly, but Google’s the parent and likely knows whats best for the child. Bad Android products mean bad press, bad press means less adoption. Less adoption leads to death in the marketplace. Obviously, Google hasn’t gone down that road yet, and clearly has no intention of doing so, based on its latest actions.

If Google took Android up a notch, demanded quality hardware and testing before the latest Android OS could be disseminated to a manufacturer for production, and at least got a cursory glance at the product before it shipped out, we’d see a heck of a lot more robust, shiny, useful and maybe even secure products hit the market. I admit, this kind of kills the whole ‘openness’ idea and leaves Google playing the role of rival Apple. It’s not App Store approval, but it’s hardware approval.

The effect, however, would mean increased consumer happiness, decreased fragmentation and better-quality products. That can only mean good things for Google. You can’t have your cake and eat it too. That’s why I think Apple has the right idea. Google doesn’t have to be as strict as Apple, but like most open relationships, its current strategy sets it up for failure. There need to be guidelines; otherwise, it all could come crumbling down.

Sign up for The VAR Guy’s Weekly Newsletter, Webcasts and Resource Center. Follow The VAR Guy via RSS, Facebook and Twitter. Follow experts at VARtweet. Read The VAR Guy’s editorial disclosures here.

Tags: Cloud Service Providers Digital Service Providers MSPs VARs/SIs Mobility Open Source

Related


  • ThinkPad X1 Titanium Yoga
    Lenovo to Ship Its Thinnest ThinkPad Yet with X1 Titanium Yoga
    Lenovo's expanded commercial line includes revamped ThinkBooks and AR glasses.
  • Samsung Galaxy S21
    Samsung Boosts Smartphone Security with New Galaxy S21 Line
    In addition, John Curtis will replace Mike Coleman as Samsung’s North America channel chief.
  • Cloud
    How Secure is Your Cloud Data?
    The global COVID-19 pandemic has caused a massive shift to remote work. According to one estimate, the number of days spent telecommuting has risen 49% since the pandemic. While the pandemic may have triggered the shift, there’s no sign things will return to normal once the crisis fades. Even prior to the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses […]
  • Microsoft Surface Pro 7+ for Business
    Microsoft Launches Surface Pro 7+ for Business, Sold Only via Channel
    The newest version of the Surface Pro is available with LTE Advanced option.

One comment

  1. Avatar RHM April 5, 2011 @ 3:26 pm
    Reply

    Good blog article. I agree that Google needs to rein-in their OHA partners. One, changing the UI has forced some Android users to run older versions of the OS with known security vulnerabilities since either or both the mfr and carrier have not provided firmware updates/upgrades in a timely manner or not at all. This is bad for the users as it is their data that are vulnerable and Google as its brand is associated with the Android OS. Two, Verizon has placed Bing as the default search engine on some of their smartphones in exchange for money from Microsoft. This directly impacts Google’s bottom-line as they make no money from either the Android OS or the hardware.

    Eventually, however, Honeycomb (Android 3.0) source code will be made available to all. At this point, Google loses control. Perhaps, Google can use their trademark and/or logo placed prominently on sanctioned devices to differentiate between their business partner’s devices from everything else that will surely come out. And, also, create a web page that clearly identifies their business partners along with their sanctioned devices. Finally, squeezing some hardware quality control into the mix, as you suggest, would also be a great idea.

    And, just for the record, Red Hat limits RHEL beta version availability to its [paid] subscribers. And further limits RHEL release candidate versions to its partners.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Don't Wait for Fall's 'Homecoming' Channel Event — CP Virtual 2021 Is Coming Soon
  • Dell Optimizes New Commercial PCs for Conferencing
  • 11 iPhones, iPads and More that Sparked the Apple Ecosystem in 2020
  • The COVID-19 Pandemic Changed the World — What’s Next for Cloud?

Galleries

View all

New, Changing Partner Programs: AWS, Tech Data, Avaya, Verizon

January 11, 2021

Industry Perspectives

View all

The Importance of Being Security-Centric

January 22, 2021

Cyberattacks: Threat Hunters Conquer Unpredictability with 3 Measures

January 21, 2021

The Right Data Migration Tool Helps Schools Move to Cloud During COVID Crisis

January 19, 2021

Webinars

View all

Who’s Behind the Mask? Hacker Personas Explained

January 26, 2021

Your Network Perimeter Has Changed

February 18, 2021

How Managed Hosting Providers Thrive with the Alternative Cloud

February 24, 2021

White Papers

View all

Why Subscription Business Model

January 15, 2021

The Ultimate MSP Guide to Sales Efficiency

January 14, 2021

Eight Reasons Why MSPs Need IT Industry-Specific Sales Tools

January 14, 2021

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Virtual

March 2, 2021 - March 4, 2021

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

November 1, 2021 - November 4, 2021

Videos and Fastchats

View all

FASTCHAT: How SOAR Eliminates Security Challenges and Elevates Service Provider Revenues

January 6, 2021

Happy Holidays from Channel Partners & Channel Futures!

December 21, 2020

FASTCHAT: How Old, Unpatched Technologies Are Creating New Security Threats for MSPs and Their Customers

December 3, 2020

Twitter

ChannelFutures

.@exabeam, @VulcanCyber, @ntti3, @Vectra_AI, @Lookout and @valtixinc give high marks to @POTUS' federal… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

Judge sides with @AWScloud against #Parler; @SADAsystems gets AI-centric board member; @EnsonoIT, @navisite get… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

2021 may be the year of the #security-centric #MSP @BarracudaMSP #remoteworking #ITsecurity #dataprotection #RMM… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

Adding #AIOps and #AI-driven WANs will help IT administrators move forward, says @MistSystems.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

Microsoft taps @tybryson as corporate VP @msuspartner group @julwhite heading to SAP, @anderson to @Qualtrics.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

#MSPs can inject predictability into #threathunting @Sophos #cybersecurity #ransomware dlvr.it/Rr4ffV https://t.co/Bztc2Yxwvc

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@RiskBased report shows decrease in #databreaches, jump in exposed records in 2020. dlvr.it/Rr4fcW https://t.co/PYiDMiJFbt

January 22, 2021
ChannelFutures

Legal experts say @VMware's #lawsuit against @nutanix's new CEO holds little weight. dlvr.it/Rr48FJ https://t.co/oLxPhgvgAt

January 21, 2021

MSSP Insider

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Channel Partners Online

Want more? Find more channel news and analysis on our sister site, Channel Partners.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Online
  • Channel Partners Events
  • MSP 501
  • MSSP Insider
  • IoT World Today
  • Webhostingtalk

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X