https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
    • MSP 501 Information Center
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity, Equity & Inclusion
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
    • MSP 501 Information Center
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


What’s Fair?

  • Written by Channel
  • September 30, 1997

Posted: 10/1997

What’s Fair?

FCC Ponders Payphone Compensation Rules in
Wake of Court Remand

"Fair’s fair," as the old saying goes. That’s
not a very enlightening definition in any context. Fortunately,
the circularity of this definition isn’t enough to support policy
arguments. Unfortunately, federal regulators continue to struggle
over trying to figure out what’s fair in compensating payphone
service providers for the costs they incur in originating calls.

Last September, the Federal Communica-tions Commission (FCC)
adopted rules that implement a section of the 1996
Telecommunications Act that requires the establishment of a
"per call compensation plan to ensure all payphone service
providers are fairly compensated for each and every completed
intrastate and interstate call using their payphone."

The new payphone compensation regulations were roundly
challenged by a variety of parties, including CompTel, and on
July 1 the U.S. Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit issued a
decision that struck down some of the FCC’s rules while upholding
others. On August 5, the FCC established a pleading cycle to
address the issues that the court remanded to it.

The appeals court rejected the
FCC’s decision to limit the type of traffic subject to
compensation to 800 and access code calls. The court
ruled that payphone service
providers should be compensated on an interim basis for
all 0+ and inmate payphone calls.

The appeals court upheld some of the FCC’s payphone
compensation rules. First, the appeals court upheld the portion
of the Commission’s plan to require interexchange
carriers–rather than callers–to pay compensation to PSPs. The
court agreed with the FCC that carriers–as the "primary
economic beneficiaries" of 800 service calls–should incur
the costs of these calls. Now, however, there is an uncomfortable
amount of uncertainty over the degree to which carriers will be
required to compensate PSPs. Second, the appeals court upheld the
FCC’s decision to require carriers to track payphone calls. This
requirement imposes new burdens on carriers, many of whom have
had to incur significant expenses in the installation of tracking
systems.

Furthermore, the appeals court rejected the FCC’s decision to
limit the type of traffic subject to compensation to 800 and
access code calls. The court ruled that payphone service
providers should be compensated on an interim basis for all 0+
and inmate payphone calls. The court’s instructions to the FCC to
include these types of calls in any new interim compensation plan
means that carriers will pay even more in compensation to
payphone providers.

In its comments filed with the Commission on August 26,
CompTel emphasized that its members do not dispute that payphone
service providers (PSPs) should be compensated for access code
and subscriber calls. PSPs ought to have a fair opportunity to
obtain a reasonable return for the services they provide;
therefore, CompTel does not object to the requirement that all
carriers handling so-called "coinless" calls–access
code or subscriber 800 calls–pay reasonable compensation to the
PSP that originates the call.

Fair compensation
means that the compensation should be based
on the costs incurred by the handlers of the compensable
call.

The appeals court
recognized this when it concluded that the FCC’s
application of a
surrogate (the local coin rate)to coinless calls was
unjustified.

CompTel’s main concern is that the compensation amount must be
fair to all parties: the PSPs receiving it, the carriers paying
it, and the consumers that ultimately must bear the cost of it.
Compensation should not result in the blocking of payphone calls
and a corresponding erosion of the service available from public
payphones. Nor should compensation mechanisms impose unfair
payment obligations on carriers without advance notice and an
opportunity to recover the additional costs they may owe.

The appeals court, in its July 1 remand, recognized that the
costs of all payphone calls are not alike. It found that CompTel
and other parties submitted "solid data" showing that
the costs of local coin calls were higher than the costs of
originating coinless calls.

Now, the FCC must choose a default compensation amount that
reflects only the cost of coinless calls–not the costs of other
calls originated from payphones. Currently, there is no
ready-made surrogate for determining the cost of compensable
payphone calls. Instead, the Commission must consider the costs
of originating these calls, and then set the compensation level
equal to the additional, or marginal, costs created by coinless
calls.

CompTel stated in its comments that, if compensation is set at
the marginal costs of coinless calls, compensation should be less
than 5 cents per call. If compensation for access code and
subscriber 800 calls is set at direct costs, it should be no more
than approximately 8 cents per call. Direct costs would include
not only the marginal costs created by a coinless call, but also
a share of the equipment and payphone line expense attributable
to the usage of the payphone. Such costs would not and should not
include costs resulting from maintenance and site visits
associated with coin equipment and coin collection, neither of
which are needed to originate coinless calls.

Finally, CompTel also stated that the 1996 Telecommunications
Act requires the FCC to adopt rules to ensure fair compensation
for payphone calls. Clearly, carriers are not obligated to pay
compensation in the absence of FCC rules which require it, and
because the appeals court vacated the FCC’s rules, carriers
should not be obligated to make compensation payments until after
the Commission adopts new rules. The FCC lacks the authority to
prescribe compensation payments on a retroactive basis.

Fair compensation means that the compensation should be based
on the costs incurred by the handlers of the compensable call. In
fact, the appeals court recognized this when it concluded that
the FCC’s application of a surrogate (the local coin rate) to
coinless calls was unjustified. In its comments, CompTel asked
the FCC to establish a new default compensation rate that is
based solely on the costs that are incurred in originating
coinless calls.

Even though the appeals court vacated the so-called
"interim" compensation plan adopted by the FCC, CompTel
believes that the fairest approach to compensation payments
dictates that, if compensation is to be paid on a per-phone
basis, the FCC must apportion that compensation equitably among
all carriers.

CompTel also stated in its comments that the FCC actually
misinterpreted the appeals court’s decision when it asserted that
"all of the requirements of the Payphone Orders–including
those portions that were remanded to the Commission–remain in
effect pending further action by the Commission on remand."
To the contrary, CompTel believes that the effect of the court’s
decision is to vacate the FCC’s rules, subject to its authority
to adopt interim rules during the remand or final rules on remand
that remedy the errors identified by the court.

Unless–and until–the FCC takes either of these courses,
carriers receiving compensable calls are not obliged to pay
compensation to PSPs for coinless calls. CompTel joined with
eight other carriers on August 15 and submitted a motion seeking
clarification that the rules have been vacated pending FCC action
on remand.

Thus, the FCC must now revisit this entire issue, including
the question of what will happen upon the expiration of the new
interim period. The new interim plan, moreover, will probably
apply to all interexchange carriers–and possibly to all
carriers–since the appeals court ruled that the FCC acted
arbitrarily and capriciously in requiring payments only from
large carriers for the first phase of the interim plan. Thus, an
interim compensation plan that would have applied only to about
two dozen carriers will now apply even to the smallest companies.
Whether that’s fair or not is a question that can be settled only
in the marketplace.

Kathleen Franklin is Director of Communications for the
Competitive Telecommunications Association (CompTel), the
principal national industry association representing more than
200 competitive telecommunications carriers and their suppliers.
CompTel can be reached at 202/296-6650. Visit CompTel on the
World Wide Web at
www.comptel.org.

Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Most Recent


  • Chatbot on laptop
    Avaya Reshapes Partner Landscape with New Cloud Products for a Hybrid World
    The company is offering more low code, no code solutions as well.
  • Conversation Intelligence Improves Outcomes for Contact Centers, Observe.AI Research Shows
    However, two-thirds of contact centers still rely on manual processes for critical workflows like agent coaching and quality assurance.
  • Unified Communications
    Vonage, GoTo, Cisco Among Key Companies in UC Market Approaching $190 Billion
    The rising adoption of mobility is increasing the demand for unified communication solutions.
  • Adam Wilson Vonage CP Europe Still
    Vonage a 'Single Communications Stack Provider' for Partners, Customers
    These are the biggest opportunities for Vonage partners today.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Conflict Boxing Gloves
    Channel Conflict, Controversy: SolarWinds Hack, Racism, Layoffs, Zoom-RingCentral
  • PlanetOne Gainey Golf Event Feature
    PlanetOne Golf Event: In-Person Channel Networking Makes Big Comeback
  • Lawsuit
    FTC Lawsuit: Frontier Communications Misled Customers About DSL Speeds
  • SaaS provider
    8x8 XCaaS Eliminates Silos, Optimizes Customer Experience

Upcoming Events

View all

MSP Summit

September 13, 2022 - September 16, 2022

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

May 1, 2023 - May 4, 2023

Galleries

View all

7 Channel People Making Waves This Week at Datto, New Relic, Kyndryl, More

July 1, 2022

Cybersecurity Experts: July 4th Weekend Ripe for Ransomware, Other Attacks

July 1, 2022

Images: HPE Discover 2022 Expo Hall Featuring Microsoft, Ingram Micro, VMware

July 1, 2022

Industry Perspectives

View all

How to Make Embracing Change Part of Your Company Culture

July 1, 2022

How to Differentiate to Leverage 5G’s Revenue Opportunity

June 28, 2022

Why MSPs are Attractive Cyberattack Targets

June 24, 2022

Webinars

View all

VEP Platform for Delivery of uCPE, SD-WAN and SASE

June 29, 2022

The Digital Worker: How to Empower Customers with a Flexible, Scalable VDI Solution to Enable Remote Work

June 30, 2022

Growing Partner Revenue and Customer Satisfaction with Power Management Services

June 23, 2022

White Papers

View all

Work Goes Remote – (and Other Top ITOps Trends)

May 25, 2022

The New Bottom Line: How MSPs Can Meet the Healthcare Crisis While Evolving Their Businesses

April 19, 2022

How to build a Security Operations Center (on a budget)

April 4, 2022

Channel Futures TV

View all

Vonage a ‘Single Communications Stack Provider’ for Partners, Customers

IBM, Partners and the $1 Trillion Hybrid Cloud Opportunity

June 26, 2022

Agents Share ‘Secrets,’ Industry Opportunity

May 11, 2022

AT&T, Microsoft, Cisco, ThreatLocker on Unlocking Partner Potential

May 6, 2022

Twitter

ChannelFutures

Channel people making waves this week include: @jpdepa3rd, @RiyaShanmugam, @sandyhogan dlvr.it/STCM6S https://t.co/oVB86ztTtP

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

#Cybersecurity experts say July 4th weekend ripe for #ransomware, other attacks. @blumirasec @Netenrich @Vectra_AI… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

New @PureStorage #ITchannel leader details jump from Veritas. dlvr.it/STBsLB https://t.co/BFSmZ5ubff

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

New Pure Storage EMEA Channel Leader Details Jump from Veritas dlvr.it/STBrPQ https://t.co/LjFXo6FbVF

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@qumulo latest channel business to confirm layoffs impacting 80 workers. #storage dlvr.it/STBh1L https://t.co/hE10wBA3ka

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

Ranking on the #MSP501 isn't just an industry accolade... it brings pride to each company and their team. Congratu… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

Company culture is ever changing in today's society - here are ways to embrace that change with @coxbusiness… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

July 1, 2022
ChannelFutures

#HPEDiscover expo hall images. Featuring @IngramMicroInc @msPartner @Veeam @Commvault and more.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

July 1, 2022

MSP 501

The industry's largest and most comprehensive partner awards program.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X