https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Master Agents
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • MSSP Insider
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • Apply Now
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Channel Educational Series
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
    • Channel Convergence
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Content Resources
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Circle of Excellence
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Master Agents
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • MSSP Insider
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • Apply Now
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Channel Educational Series
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
    • Channel Convergence
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Content Resources
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Circle of Excellence
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


Softswitches Challenge Global Carriers

  • Written by Channel
  • July 31, 2000

Posted: 08/2000

Soap Box

Softswitches Challenge Global Carriers

The softswitch, or media gateway controller (MGC), may revolutionize telecommunications services. It will push intelligent function to the edge of the network, enable voice and data convergence, and allow the flexibility of local service creation with the possibility of centralized control.

Through open APIs, it fosters wide-scale innovation of services and can empower customers to define or create their own services.

The modular dismantling of traditional network components and elimination of proprietary software have spawned a new generation of switching hardware contenders, which are not constrained by the proprietary circuit switch mega-manufacturers. They also already address the need to push convergence.

Efforts to integrate voice over DSL (VoDSL) gateways, IADs and multiple access protocols are under way.

However, today’s softswitch has limitations for the international service provider that deploys a truly converged network. The amount of interaction among devices has increased, yet this interaction must be carried over a worldwide network.

Unlike most domestic networks, this comprises expensive and scarce circuits, which at times may be unreliable and possess some inherent latency. This highlights the concern for efficient use and balance between distributed intelligence and centralized control.

New Global Telecom
(www.ngt.com) has requested information with our specific requirements and concerns. While a study is not all-inclusive, we have examined hundreds of pages from a dozen vendors, and we are betting on softswitch technology.

But to provide Tier 1 quality on a global level, development must be made in network architecture, reliability, service control, internetworking and session management.

Architecture

Like many modern telecom carriers, we are replacing our time-division multiplexed (TDM) network with IP- and ATM-based packet technologies, in order to carry voice and data over the same network and because of benefits derived from end-to-end voice packetization.

The next-generation network effectively explodes the switching and processing functions from a central point out to the network’s edge. This stretches the switch matrix and control links across the globe. The switch, which housed all functions in one pre-engineered cabinet, now is de-coupled and distributed.

In next-gen architecture, the tandem switch’s trunk bays are replaced by media gateways at the edge of the network. The tandem switch’s matrix is replaced by the packet-based bearer network, and the tandem switch’s control processors are replaced by the softswitch.

The echo control and digital circuit multiplication equipment (DCME) compression that happened outside the tandem switch is handled in the media gateway.

Replacing the tandem switch’s non-blocking switching matrix with an international data network raises several issues. The softswitch must monitor the state-of-the-bearer network, so it can make intelligent decisions to reroute traffic or apply compression coders/decoders (codecs) when the bearer network is full.

To gain maximum efficiencies in the bearer data network, media gateway and softswitch technology must include methods of dynamically allocating bandwidth by self-learning and monitoring traffic loads. While many domestic carriers have the bandwidth to create an underutilized, non-blocking data network to handle their VoIP traffic, it is not economically feasible internationally. It also defeats the purpose of having a converged, multiservice network.

Reliability

While the TDM switch had a reliability factor (typically 99.999 percent), several elements now must be examined. The reliability of each element is a function of hardware selection and operating system selection. Even if each has a “five 9″reliability, when combined, a reduction of total system reliability is incurred.

Vendors that offer a total solution for next-gen voice networks must establish reliability tests and publish them as a systemwide figure. The reality of a multivendor environment complicates this issue and almost demands that carriers test their service environment.

Service Control

Most international deployments must allow for call and service control functions to be deployed to the network’s edge. The database and service provisioning functions also must have the flexibility for centralized or local control, depending on the application.

The ability for all network elements to appear as one device with one point code–a “virtual tandem”–is desirable. This is important for database administration, service control, call control, telephony signaling and network management.

But how much control and intelligence should be provided to the local softswitch?

A completely centralized approach would require individual messaging for each stage of call setup and teardown. This would create tremendous overhead on an international
network.

The opposite approach dictates softswitches in every region operate solely on its resident database. In this case, the softswitch may not be aware of the state of the intended egress point–possibly several nodes away. In turn, this could limit the intelligence with which it routes, compresses and prioritizes.

The best arrangement involves a compromise where the ingress softswitch has been provided enough information to intelligently package and route the call.

Another debate involves where enhanced service applications reside. While it seems clear that Class 4 services are best served within the softswitch, other services related to Class 5 and enhanced retail features may be served through a separate applications server. This is the same debate that TDM switches have with the transaction capabilities application part/intelligent network (TCAP/IN) model.

The current thought within Internet Engineering Task Forces’
(www.ietf.org) session initiation protocol-telephony service interface
(SIP-TSI) is to house the call control layer in the softswitch and offload the service control layer to an outboard applications server.

Enhanced services most certainly will require the user to remain interactive throughout the call event. This means the applications server must maintain a SIP user-agent to user-agent connection, as well as a media pathway to the media gateway network, to enable tone/voice recognition responses and to play interactive voice response (IVR) sequences.

It also means duplicating some hardware and functions already found in the softswitch and media gateways. A more useful approach for international carriers would be to locate as much service control layer as possible in the softswitch and to use the digital signal processors (DSPs) located in the gateways and access applications servers for instructions on other services as needed.

Architecture scalability concerns go both ways. Based on market demands, one regional location may have dozens of circuits while a main site may have thousands. The ability to support both in a cost-effective manner
is essential.

Internetworking

Standards between the softswitch and the MGC are being developed. H.323 gained initial momentum, but it seems that media gateway control (MEGACO) and SIP now are in the spotlight. Protocols also are required among the softswitch, applications server and other softswitches.

Any international implementation needs to address the existing capabilities in many SS7-oriented standards related to routing, e.g., E.170, E.351 E.411 and E.412.

These deal with operational issues such as real-time surveillance, transmission failures, circuit types, signaling conditions, congestion and blocking. Commercial issues include call and network control mechanisms and routing schemes.

When considering a multisoftswitch network or internetworking between carriers, it is imperative to interoperate on the bearer control layer and the call control layer. Otherwise it hinders the quality of international voice due to issues such as multihop voice/fax compression, end-to-end compression algorithms and QoS adherence. This could be accomplished by the global adoption of an SS7 variant such as Bearer Independent Call Control (BICC) (ISDN user part, ISUP+), H.323, or other packet-based protocols.

Once all these standards are in place, we need the capibility to modify them. Control through using Layer 3 message transfer part (MTP) and Layer 4 ISUP screening and field manipulation allows carriers to compensate for nonstandard connectivity.

Routing Capabilities

Most current routing schemes do not support the complex nature of the international internetworking. Carriers will continue to connect with other foreign and domestic carriers to achieve cost-effective global coverage.

But they define their network services and costs differently. What is a cellular call to one carrier may not be to another. And cost may differ by a factor of three.

Session Management

Finally, we must have session management reporting. Individual elements need to report call events to be correlated by network and service management systems.

The International Softswitch Consortium
(www.softswitch.org) session management working group recommends interoperability of upstream network management and mediation systems within networks containing independently developed switching, gateway and border element devices through standard format.

Numerous efforts on accelerated tracks are being made to address these issues, but many developments diverge. Also, an effort has begun to adapt this technology to the markets with mature infrastructure and rapid growth in available bandwidth.

The international provider will require some special development to reap these technology benefits. The effects on their economies should be dramatic.

It simply is not enough to design a network that works. You must build one that works with other diverse networks and keeps working through unexpected conditions and global changes.

Lee Story is senior vice president of operations
and technology (lstory@ngtele.com), Mark Bolton
is director of research and development (mark@ngtele.com) and Jon Hickam is a network architect
(hickam@ngtele.com). All three are designing and implementing New Global Telecom’s
(www.ngt.com) next-generation network.

By Lee Story, Mark Bolton and Jon HickamPHONE+ invites you

to air your views.

Call us at +1 480 990 1101

or e-mail khenderson@vpico.com.


ROUNDTABLE

On who’s slamming whom …”AT&T has a history of slamming violations in long distance. Now they have transferred their illegal slamming activities into the local toll market in California.”

–Sandy
McGreevy, director of consumer protection, Pacific Bell (www.pacbell.com)

“SBC/Pacific Bell’s [slamming] actions demonstrate that it is not willing to compete on a level playing field.”

–Lois
Hedgpeth, president, AT&T Pacific Region (www.att.com)

On June 6, WorldCom Inc. (www.wcom.com) “agreed to pay the largest slamming payment in the history of the commission and to substantially change their behavior toward their customers. This action puts the entire industry on notice that consumers should not be hoodwinked over the phone. We have zero tolerance for slammers.”

—William E. Kennard, chairman, FCC
(www.fcc.gov)

“The FCC and the states will be stepping up their information sharing of various specific company slamming activities. As a result, repeat offenders will be more likely to suffer additional penalties, including the potential loss of an operating certificate in a particular state or an additional fine for multiple offenses imposed by the FCC.”

—Bob Rowe, president, National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners
(www.naruc.org)

Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Related


  • Fusion Connect's Rick Ribas
    Channel People on the Move: 8x8, TBI, Telarus, Microsoft, IBM, More
    Now featuring big new hires and promotions in the telecom and IT channels.
  • Word innovation with power button
    Exclusive: As AWS Turns 15, Doug Yeum Predicts Even More Innovation
    The head of channel talks milestones, what’s coming, telecom agents and working with new CEO Adam Selipsky.
  • Deadline
    7 Hot Stories: Big UCaaS Dispute, Sierra Ransomware, Telarus M&A and the End of an Era
    It's our final weekly wrap before the big convergence.
  • Momentum SIP
    MicroCorp Joins Intelisys, Telarus as Ujet Partner
    Ujet has also recently partnered with Intelisys and Telarus.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Trending Stories: RingCentral-Zoom Legal Fight, AT&T Business 5G, Rick Ribas' New Job
  • Enhanced Zoom Master Agent Program Means Bigger Commissions
  • RingCentral-Zoom War of Words Continues as Court Issues Temporary Restraining Order
  • PGi, Windstream, IBM Vet to Lead Broadvoice's Channel Marketing

Galleries

View all

10 Ways to Keep Customers Safe with Threat Protection by Year’s End

April 9, 2021

Industry Perspectives

View all

Why Every MSP Should Consider TCO When Selecting a BCDR Solution

April 9, 2021

6 Ways to Ready Your Customers for 5G Security Challenges

April 5, 2021

Endpoint Security Is Huge in the Merging New World of Work

April 2, 2021

Webinars

View all

Top 3 Intel Security Technologies To Help Against Advanced Cybercrime Attacks

April 15, 2021

What to Look For: 2021 Threat Report

April 22, 2021

Health Care and SD-WAN: A Seller’s Guide

April 27, 2021

White Papers

View all

Top Tips: How Resellers Can Leverage Rackspace to Enhance Customer’s Cyber Security Protection with Microsoft 365 Security

March 30, 2021

Top Tips: Optimize Your Microsoft 365 Investment with Rackspace Technology

March 30, 2021

The Smart Approach to Cloud Workload Placement Decisions

March 19, 2021

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

November 1, 2021 - November 4, 2021

MSP Summit

November 1, 2021 - November 2, 2021

Channel Evolution Europe

November 30, 2021 - December 1, 2021

Videos and Fastchats

View all

FASTCHAT: How Fortinet Reduces Complexity Through Networking, Security

Strong Customer Experience Needs Strong Partner Experience

December 22, 2020

Happy Holidays from Channel Partners & Channel Futures!

December 21, 2020

2021 Excellence in Digital Services Awards App Open

December 9, 2020

Twitter

ChannelFutures

"Who could ask for more?? These guys bring an awesome energy and always highlight the need-to-know of the channel..… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 10, 2021
ChannelFutures

Anti-Asian racism, and racism and discrimination of all forms, have zero place in our society. #StopAsianHate and t… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 9, 2021
ChannelFutures

MSSP @inc_renaissance promotes Trish Kapos to channel chief. #cybersecurity dlvr.it/RxLQ6g https://t.co/oWCdHeRqIW

April 9, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@GetSpectrum ordered to pay @Windstream more than $19 million for deceptive mailer. #lawsuit… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 9, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@Percona says channel can help with #opensource solutions and #databases for everything from aspirational to must-… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 9, 2021
ChannelFutures

Our latest #Cybersecurity Roundup features @HuntressLabs on @Microsoft Exchange exploitation, @ptsecurity,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 9, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@SemperisTech unveils first branded partner program. #cybersecurity dlvr.it/RxH4Bq https://t.co/TVjG8xhGNv

April 8, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@PerchSecurity announces its 2021 MSP Threat Report, calling on MSPs to build a mature cybersecurity practice.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 8, 2021

MSSP Insider

Business advice for MSSPs and news from the broader security channel.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X