https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2023 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Technology Advisor 101 (TA 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • 2023 Call for Speakers
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2023 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Technology Advisor 101 (TA 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • 2023 Call for Speakers
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


IntraLATA Toll Dialing Parity:

  • Written by Channel
  • October 31, 1998

Posted: 11/1998

Soap Box

IntraLATA Toll Dialing Parity:
Last Bastion of the RBOCs

By Ernest B. Kelly III

Return with me now to late fall 1995, in the last days of the epic struggle to fashion
the legislative compromises that eventually would result in the passage of the
Telecommunications Act of 1996. In drafting that bill, one of the most bitterly fought
issues was that of intraLATA (local access and transport area) toll dialing parity, or the
ability for consumers to access a competitive provider of so-called local long distance
service without having to dial extra digits.

At that point in time, dialing parity was commonplace in long distance, where it is
known as "1+." The advent of interLATA dialing parity has been widely referenced
by industry experts as one of the single most important milestones in the development of
competition in long distance markets. Its application to IntraLATA service was widely
anticipated as a natural outcome of any legislation.

Widely anticipated, that is, by everyone except the regional Bell operating companies
(RBOCs). Their legislative idea for intraLATA dialing parity was to roll it back in any
states where it already existed and maintain restrictions on its implementation in the
others. So a big lobbying tussle ensued with each side digging in hard. The RBOCs wanted
it tied to their long distance entry; the competitors wanted it implemented immediately.

Back and forth they grappled, like two heavyweight Greco-Roman wrestlers. Competitors
argued that prices for local long distance were too high, that the RBOCs were grossly
over-earning in these markets and reaping huge monopoly profits. For their part, the RBOCs
argued that the higher rates were essential to their ability to keep local rates at
affordable levels, and if 1+ intraLATA dialing parity was instituted unilaterally then
they would have no choice but to raise local rates.

So in one of its great Solomon-like compromises, Congress essentially cut the baby in
two, thus serving no one very well, particularly the baby. It decided to grandfather those
states that already had, or were in the process of instituting, intraLATA dialing parity
as of a certain date, while prohibiting implementation by other states (with the exception
of single-LATA states for a three-year period of time, ending Feb. 8, 1999). If an RBOC
was granted interLATA authority during that time period, it would have to provide
intraLATA toll dialing parity concurrently.

The Congress fashioned this compromise with specific goals in mind and for specific
purposes. First and foremost, it wanted to encourage, not discourage, intraLATA dialing
parity. It did so through the grandfather clause, the single-LATA state exception, and by
setting a date certain for the end of the time when the other states could not implement
it. Lawmakers knew that enabling the states to move forward after a certain date would
serve to keep the pressure on the RBOCs to open up their local markets to competition in
the interim. In fact, the law specifically says that states may adopt requirements for
intraLATA presubscription before the February 1999 date. They just could not become
effective until that date. If that isn’t an indication of their predisposition on this
issue, I don’t know what is.

So, Congress agreed to further delay nationwide intraLATA dialing parity for a
three-year period of time. It did not want to delay its implementation beyond that point,
no matter what happened in the market. Remember, at that point, as with today, a number of
states already had intraLATA presubscription. Thus, citizens in many states were
benefiting from increased "1+" intraLATA competition while others were not.
Congress did not want to prolong that inequity any longer than necessary. Neither should
the states. Finally, if Congress had wanted to link it directly to the granting of long
distance authority, it would have done so. It did not.

Time flew, and today we find ourselves nearing the end of that three-year prohibition.
Several of the remaining states have begun the processes necessary to allow them to
implement 1+ intraLATA dialing parity by the February 1999 deadline. But guess who’s back
at various state regulatory agencies around the country seeking yet another generous
helping of intraLATA monopoly pie? Our old friends, the RBOCs. Fewer in number to be sure,
but just as greedy as ever. They now want the states to delay the imposition of intraLATA
dialing parity until they get into in-region long distance.

The RBOCs argue that nothing in the act actually requires presubscription, so state
regulators are free to continue to delay intraLATA presubscription. Even though that is
not what the Congress intended or stated, they are, to coin a phrase, "legally
accurate." Sound familiar? These, of course, are the same companies that paraded
their CEOs out one by one when the bill was signed into law, to praise its contents as
equitable and fair and to pledge to make it work.

At the time the act was passed, three years was assumed to be enough time for the RBOCs
to have opened their local markets completely to allow for their entry into in-region
interLATA long distance. For most RBOCs and in most states, that has not happened. It does
appear that Bell Atlantic Corp. is on course to convince the authorities in New York that
it has sufficiently opened its local markets to competition and may achieve in-region
intraLATA entry roughly on schedule. But then the situation in New York is different from
other states. And therein lies the point. If the RBOCs had moved aggressively to fully and
fairly open their local markets this all might be a moot issue. But they have not.

With less than six months to go, it is time for state regulators to initiate intraLATA
presubscription proceedings to bring the blessings of this much-needed competitive thrust
to their constituents. We already have seen some recent progress in Washington, Colorado,
Maryland and Virginia. It’s time for the states that have not yet recognized the urgency
of this matter to move ahead and institute intraLATA dialing parity. That certainly will
do more for the cause of local competition than allowing the RBOCs additional time at the
feeding trough. It seems unthinkable that state regulators would want to further delay the
advent of this critical element of local competition, which is so clearly in the public
interest.

Ernest B.
Kelly III is president of the Telecommunications Resellers Association (TRA), the
Washington-based national organization representing more than 650 resellers of
telecommunications services. He can be reached at +1 202 835 9898.

ROUNDTABLE…
On the proposed SBC Communications Inc. Takeover of Ameritech Corp."

A
merger between SBC and Ameritech would be the best that could be achieved in meeting the
goals of the Telecommunications Act of 1996. Those companies would continue to maintain
carrier-of-last-resort obligations and would continue to serve 90 percent of residential
consumers in their areas."
–Morton Bahr, President, Communications Workers of America

"The planned merger, although driven by the need for national presence in the
landline telecom market, will have significant impact on the U.S. wireless industry [such
as further concentration of market power, with the top six operators controlling 70
percent of subscribers]."
–David Kerr, Director of Mobile Communications Services, Strategy Analytics

"We heard SBC promise increased competition when it bought Pacific Telesis. It
didn’t happen. SBC promised more market opening and competition when it announced its
purchase of Southern New England Telephone. It didn’t happen. … Now, SBC wants to buy
Ameritech–instead of expanding competition, these two companies have found a way to
expand their monopoly reach and control."
–C. Michael Armstrong, Chairman, AT&T Corp.

Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Most Recent


  • Layoffs
    Telecom-IT Layoff Tracker 2023: Cisco, RingCentral, Microsoft, 8x8, Sophos, More
    The onslaught of layoffs is bleeding over into this month.
  • Job Cuts
    January's Tech Layoff Scourge: Deep Dive Into Channel Impact
    We break down the seemingly daily layoffs impacting various companies doing business in the channel.
  • Select, circle individual
    Broadvoice Appoints 8x8, Mitel Vet as VP of Channel Partnerships and Alliances
    He brings UCaaS and CCaaS leadership to Broadvoice's partnership strategy.
  • Layoffs
    Talkdesk Layoffs Impact Sizable Number of Workers, Former Employee Says
    Talkdesk did not provide reasons for the reduction in headcount, one laid-off worker said.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Woman with questions
    Should We Just Call Master Agents Distributors?
  • Benefit, Plus Sign
    TBI, Avant Add New Cloud, Security Suppliers to Lineups
  • CIO
    ScanSource Hires New CIO to Lead Global IT Strategy
  • Select a Hire
    Telarus Hires Megapath, Fusion Connect Vet Dan Foster as Latest CRO

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

May 1, 2023 - May 4, 2023

Channel Partners Europe

June 13, 2023 - June 14, 2023

Channel Futures Leadership Summit

October 30, 2023 - November 2, 2023

Galleries

View all

7 Channel People Making Waves This Week at Pax8, Canalys, Microsoft, Splunk, More

February 3, 2023

Post-TBI Acquisition, Partners Weigh the Future of AppDirect, TSDs

February 3, 2023

Juniper Networks Shows ‘Swagger’ with Ambitious Growth Strategy

February 3, 2023

Industry Perspectives

View all

The Software Patching Problem – Solved

February 3, 2023

How to Break Through the Growth Ceiling

February 1, 2023

5 Things to Look for in a UC Partner

January 31, 2023

Webinars

View all

Next-Generation MSP Platform: The Building Blocks for Your Business

February 15, 2023

How To Boost Your Business With White-Label UCaaS

February 28, 2023

Security Secrets of the MSP 501: How to Be a Cyber Leader in 2023

December 15, 2022
  • 1

White Papers

View all

6 UCaaS Reseller Challenges and How Real World Businesses Solved Them

February 1, 2023

Frost Radar: North American UCaaS Market, 2022

February 1, 2023

The Complete Guide to White-Label UCaaS for Reseller Success

February 1, 2023

Channel Futures TV

View all

Coffee with Craig and James Episode 117: Cato Networks, Video Killed the Podcast Stars

Retired Astronaut Capt. Scott Kelly Previews His CP Expo Keynote

December 21, 2022

Fusion Connect Eyes Future with Intrado UC, Managed Network Customers

September 23, 2022

RingCentral Focused on Hybrid Work, Microsoft Teams, Other Integrations

September 23, 2022

Twitter

ChannelFutures

Channel people making waves include: @RobTRae, @vasujakkal, @ReneeIMCloud, @garylsteele dlvr.it/ShvjQ3 https://t.co/yz09flzXvV

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

The slowdown in #publiccloud spending is real and it’s arrived at #AWSCloud and #GoogleCloud.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

#ZTW23: @ThreatLocker Gold Partners announced, deep dive into the dark web. dlvr.it/ShvFGF https://t.co/k68BfzLToq

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

Channel Partner Success Story: Forerunner Technologies - Learn how @NEC UNIVERGE BLUE Cloud Solutions enabled… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

Partners and suppliers weighed in on the AppDirect-TBI acquisition and its implications for the channel.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

Read about @coxbusiness' acquisition of @Logicworks. dlvr.it/Shty4t https://t.co/3MaKai6SVr

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

Where in the world are the top MSPs?? Take a look at the infographic breakdown of 2022 #MSP501 winners by region >>… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

February 3, 2023
ChannelFutures

.@SovosCompliance offers tips for how and when to revamp #partnerplans. dlvr.it/ShtDgv https://t.co/vPzajXnjee

February 3, 2023

MSP 501

The industry's largest and most comprehensive partner awards program.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X