https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Master Agents
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • MSSP Insider
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • Apply Now
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Channel Educational Series
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
    • Channel Convergence
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Content Resources
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Circle of Excellence
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Master Agents
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
    • Diversity & Inclusion
  • MSSP Insider
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • Apply Now
    • 2020 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2020 Hot 101 Rankings
    • 2020 MSP 501 Report
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • Videos
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
    • Channel Educational Series
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
    • Channel Convergence
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Content Resources
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2021 MSP 501
    • Circle of Excellence
    • Excellence in Digital Services
    • Top Gun 51
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • Channel Evolution Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


Consumer Disclosure: Next Step for Phone CardMarketers

  • Written by Channel
  • January 31, 2000

Posted: 03/2000

Soap Box

Consumer Disclosure: Next Step for Phone Card
Marketers

By Howard Segermark

Consulting firm ATLANTIC-ACM (www.atlantic-acm.com)
predicts that in 2000, approximately $5 billion worth of phone cards will be sold in the
United States alone. That’s practically one-half billion cards. The industry is fairly
crowded. And, although there have been numerous consolidations, many companies still are
getting into the business because of the ease of doing so. Thus, profit margins are razor
thin and competition is intense.

Much like the highly contested home business and long-distance postpaid markets, phone
card issuers are trying to innovate by offering to the consumer alternative ways of buying
their service. For several years, we have seen cards offering low per-minute rates in
exchange for a periodic or per-call surcharge. More recently, the per-minute rates have
plunged while the surcharges have multiplied.

Therein lies the rub. When does a multiplicity of surcharges cease to be innovative
packaging and begin to be a deceptive trade practice?

One response to that question is this: Don’t worry about cards that are confusing.
Worry about cards that are not providing service. There are still a number of those
around.

Factually, this is true: There are phone card companies that no longer provide service,
in turn, hurting both creditors and consumers. Nevertheless, at least two state attorneys
general–in New Mexico and Colorado–have opened investigations into deceptive phone
cards. The Federal Trade Commission (FTC, www.ftc.gov)
already has acted against one phone card company for an allegedly deceptive website.

The FTC and the FCC (www.fcc.gov) held in November a
joint meeting on "Advertising and Marketing of Dial-Around and Other Long Distance
Services to Consumers." The prepaid card industry association, International Telecard
Assoc-iation (ITA, www.telecard.org) attended.
Though prepaid phone cards were not specified on the agenda, the meeting quickly
evolved into a phone-card bashing session. (One representative of another majortelecom
trade association saw an opportunity to take attention away from his group by recommending
federal regulation of phone cards.)

New Mexico Assistant Attorney and Director of the Consumer Protection Division Robert
Reyna was quoted as saying (erroneously) that there were "no government
regulations" on phone cards. I have contacted him and offered the ITA’s cooperation
on this issue. In subsequent conversation with Reyna, it is clear he is concerned yet he
is looking to the industry to formulate its own guidelines on disclosure.

A Denver television station in November aired an exposi on a phone card issuer who
admitted the disclosure information on his cards was not true. The Colorado Deputy
Attorney General for Consumer Protection Garth Lucero promised to investigate such
practices. The ITA has been in touch with his office to assist and offer expertise in this
matter.

What are the bases for such accusations of deceptive practices?

According to the FTC’s "Policy Statement on Deception," there exists
deception "if there is a representation, omission or practice that is likely to
mislead the consumer acting reasonably in the circumstances, to the consumer’s
detriment."

Another relevant statement by the FTC regarding pricing is as follows: "Depending
on the circumstances, accurate information in the text may not remedy a false headline
because reasonable consumers may glance only at the headline. Written disclosures or fine
print may be insufficient to correct misleading representations."

The FTC concludes: "The Commission will find an act or practice deceptive if there
is a misrepresentation, omission, or other practice that misleads the consumer acting
reasonably in the circumstances, to the consumer’s detriment."

These excerpts constitute an invitation for a great deal of action and it is fair to
note that individual state deceptive practice laws follow closely the FTC’s rules. So,
what can the industry do? In response to this problem, ITA has delegated its Standards
Committee to develop new "Industry Guidelines" on consumer disclosure. This will
call for the first major revision in the association’s guidelines in more than four years.

The importance of this is the ITA Industry Guidelines have formed the basis for every
regulatory regime for phone cards that has been adopted over the past four years. Thus, it
is likely any new ITA guidelines concerning consumer disclosure will be seriously
considered by those who write the laws and draft the regulations on phone cards.

With that in mind, the ITA has asked for the input of the regulators prior to the
development of these new standards. In addition, groups, such as Consumer Action (www.consumer-action.org), have been asked also
for their contribution in this matter.

The scope of the survey administered by the ITA Standards Committee is very wide
reaching, covering such topics as whether the number of surcharges should be capped, what
information should be on the face of a vending machine and how a customer should be
informed of the rates for international calls.

In supporting revision of the industry guidelines, Gary Frank, ITA Chairman of the
Board and President/CEO of VoCall Communications (www.vocall.com),
has said, "It isn’t that the ITA wants to regulate how people market their product,
but it is far better for the ITA to develop fair and reasonable standards that we can all
live with."

The unfortunate hazard, of course, is unless the industry acts to propose reasonable
standards, harsh regulations might be imposed. Extreme rules might levy such a cost on the
legitimate phone card issuer, that he cannot profitably market cards in a given state.
Concomitantly, regulations may impose great costs on the legitimate issuer, thus allowing
the unscrupulous issuer to ignore the rules and undersell the legitimate cards.

Though there is great interest in other states, California may be the first to pursue
card issuers based on poor or misleading information. Laws that went into effect last year
will have teeth put into them by five new enforcement agents hired recently by the
California PUC (CPUC). The ITA took a group of industry leaders to San Francisco on Jan.
27 to meet with these regulators to discuss the issues facing the industry and exchange
ideas. The meeting was a productive one and ended with a commitment to maintain an open
and ongoing communication. The next six months or so will be important to watch, as cases
are brought to the fore and heat is put on particular companies that do not conform with
California’s rules.

Even though the California rules do not cover all the innovative ways of packaging
prepaid long-distance service, I believe other states will be watching the CPUC’s
enforcement actions very closely. This issue is of too great an importance not to grab the
attention of both regulators and enforcement officials nationwide. It is too important
also not to pique the interest of legitimate phone card issuers who are less and less
tolerant of scofflaw and/or rip-off phone card issuers.

There is also a major subissue when we talk about regulation and equal enforcement of
the laws, and this is taxes, including both the FCC tax and universal service fees. In
discussing this issue in public fora, I often have noted that the federal government did
not catch Al Capone on bootlegging charges. It got him instead on his failure to pay
taxes. Though the reasoning of revenuers is beyond mortal man, one may speculate that the
smoke generated from a phone card company being fined by a regulatory agency might find
its way to the nostrils of a tax agent. In fact, in hearings before the Senate Finance
Committee last year, IRS audit agents testified they were more likely to audit a company
when it was in the news. Just one more reason to walk the straight and narrow.

Howard Segermark is the executive director of the International Telecard Association
(ITA), a Washington-based trade group. He can be reached at +1 800 958 7824. The ITA
Standards Committee Survey may be accessed on the association’s website at www.telecard.org.


ROUNDTABLE

On local exchange competition …"I just want to say to all the
competitors, ‘Thank you for not leaving us to the mercy of the local phone companies.’ I
for one will advocate competition."

–Representative Thomas Bliley Jr., R-Va.

"In almost every sector, new industries have sprouted, and competition is driving
down rates, spurring innovations, bringing consumers more choices, better services. If
anyone tells you that this [1996 Telecom] act is not working, I hope you will set them
straight."

–William E. Kennard, chairman, FCC

"To me, competition means free and open markets. For instance, free and open
access to the facilities we [the competitors] need to be able to offer our services. But
transitioning from a monopolistic to a competitive marketplace is difficult in many
aspects. However, we can’t be premature about it, we can’t let down our guard, and we have
to remember that it just takes a while."

–Randall B. Lowe, executive vice president
and chief legal officer, Prism Communication Services Inc.

Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Related


  • CwCJ Logo 2020
    Coffee with Craig and James Episode No. 92: Fusion Connect, Master Agent M&A
    We get the inside scoop from Fusion Connect channel chief Rick Ribas and talk mergers with an industry expert.
  • Businesswoman with help sign
    SMBs Need Channel Partners to Help with Long-Term Remote Working
    Research shows UK SMBs need help from partners with their technology investments.
  • Survey says
    Cloud Communications Market Rocked by Microsoft, COVID-19 in 2020
    The perceived competitiveness of Slack and Google slid year over year.
  • Fuel Pump
    Vonage, Oracle, Salesforce Vets to Fuel Talkdesk Partners' Growth
    In the first two months of 2021, reseller partners have extended Talkdesk's global reach.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Telarus Vet Ends Short 'Retirement,' Will Lead PPT Solutions' Channel Sales Strategy
  • TBI Adds Rival Intelisys Alum, Tech Data, 8x8 Vets
  • 8x8 Joins Microsoft as Westcon Partner to Spur International Growth
  • Granite Unleashes Microsoft Teams Integration, Merged Voice Services

Galleries

View all

Biden Administration Issues Russian Sanctions in Response to SolarWinds Hack, Election Interference

April 16, 2021

Industry Perspectives

View all

Why Digital Transformation Is the ‘Invisible Hand’ of Our Time

April 19, 2021

SD-WAN Supports More Purposeful Shift to Cloud

April 16, 2021

How Tech Is Transforming Public Safety–and the Implications for Channel Partners

April 15, 2021

Webinars

View all

What to Look For: 2021 Threat Report

April 22, 2021

Health Care and SD-WAN: A Seller’s Guide

April 27, 2021

How MSPs Can Leverage SOCaaS to Improve Security & Grow Revenue

May 4, 2021

White Papers

View all

Carbonite Data Protection and Cyber Resilience

April 15, 2021

Top Tips: How Resellers Can Leverage Rackspace to Enhance Customer’s Cyber Security Protection with Microsoft 365 Security

March 30, 2021

Top Tips: Optimize Your Microsoft 365 Investment with Rackspace Technology

March 30, 2021

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

November 1, 2021 - November 4, 2021

MSP Summit

November 1, 2021 - November 2, 2021

Channel Evolution Europe

November 30, 2021 - December 1, 2021

Videos and Fastchats

View all

5 Reasons Diversity, Equity and Inclusion Is Important

Five9 Shares Insights on Implementing a DE&I Strategy

April 13, 2021

FASTCHAT: How Fortinet Reduces Complexity Through Networking, Security

March 31, 2021

Strong Customer Experience Needs Strong Partner Experience

December 22, 2020

Twitter

ChannelFutures

.@Riverbed promotes a pair of channel executives to key positions. @RiverbedPartner @megbhappy… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 20, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@Avant_CCC is help agents get better at consultative sales. dlvr.it/Ry3zJ6 https://t.co/nNkJ942wRr

April 20, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@Avaya Cloud Office by @RingCentral further expands globally, includes new features. #UCaaS dlvr.it/Ry1QMg https://t.co/sVTkX6u4SO

April 19, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@attcyber and @SentinelOne teamed up around endpoint #security. dlvr.it/Ry1GMh https://t.co/LGV3RjpUBK

April 19, 2021
ChannelFutures

#Kubernetes expertise will help #channelpartners win big in move to cloud, says @Infoblox. dlvr.it/Ry16sP https://t.co/8lB4T93fuN

April 19, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@CambiumNetworks unveils new #partnerprogram focused on health care. dlvr.it/Ry12RG https://t.co/uGNMBQyQUa

April 19, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@solarwinds pays top executives more than $65 million despite massive hack. #cybersecurity dlvr.it/Ry0tXf https://t.co/1XjFpk7WMl

April 19, 2021
ChannelFutures

.@DruvaInc now valued at $2 billion. What does this mean for #Compass channel partners? Find out what we know.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

April 19, 2021

MSSP Insider

Business advice for MSSPs and news from the broader security channel.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2021 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X