https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2023 MSP 501 Application
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2023 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Technology Advisor 101 (TA 101)
    • Channel Leaders Lists
  • Events
    • Back
    • 2023 Call for Speakers
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2023 MSP 501 Application
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2023 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Technology Advisor 101 (TA 101)
    • Channel Leaders Lists
  • Events
    • Back
    • 2023 Call for Speakers
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Telephony/UC/Collaboration


Competitors Criticize Powell’s Proposal

  • Written by Channel
  • March 31, 2004



The competitive local phone industry is irate.

FCC Chairman Michael Powell has proposed that local phone companies enter 30 days of talks with the regional Bells to negotiate wholesale rates following a federal court decision that marked a victory for BellSouth Corp. and Verizon Communications Inc.

AT&T Corp. was among scores of phone companies to criticize the proposal, saying it has yet to enter one agreement over the last eight years with a Bell operator that didn’t require government intervention. “While we will seize any opportunity and would be more than willing to make it eight years and 30 days of good-faith negotiations, we are skeptical that such discussions will suddenly bear fruit and result in a competitive marketplace, particularly under the anti-consumer D.C. Circuit decision,” AT&T general counsel Jim Cicconi says.

Speaking March 10 in Washington during the National Association of Regulatory Utility Commissioners (NARUC) winter convention, Powell said if those private negotiations failed, he would propose adopting interim rules. He said he would work with his colleagues to support an 18-month transition period away from the unbundled network element- platform (UNE-P). At stake is the right of phone companies to lease the Bell networks - including their switches used to route the local traffic of small businesses and consumers - at rates state regulators set.

“To absolutely ensure stability and to eliminate the possibility of consumers experiencing significant disruptions, I will work with my colleagues to craft an 18-month moratorium and transition to protect existing UNE-P customers from sudden changes in their service,” Powell said.

The PACE (Promoting Active Competition Everywhere) Coalition was among the groups representing Bell competitors to bash Powell’s proposal. “The chairman’s proposal for a moratorium and transition for UNE-P without benefit of any review or assessment of the factual records being developed in state impairment dockets prejudices this critical issue and calls into question his role as a neutral decision-maker,” the coalition said in a press statement. “The evidence uncovered in the state proceedings demonstrates that the chairman’s premature conclusion is wrong. The chairman’s proposal amounts to a blatant attempt to derail the Supreme Court appeal process.”

BellSouth welcomed Powell’s remarks, saying the Atlanta-based company “is ready to negotiate agreements with CLECs that are serious about offering consumers a sustainable competitive alternative.”

“BellSouth is seizing this opportunity by inviting its competitors to enter into serious negotiations of market-based commercial agreements aimed at benefiting the customer, establishing stability in the industry and allowing real competition to continue throughout its region,” BellSouth said. “The company will negotiate commercial agreements that are reasonable, include competitive rates and advance a free-market environment within the industry.”

Verizon Communications Inc., the No. 1 local phone company, made similar observations. “We agree the time is ripe for the industry to strike commercial agreements,” said Tom Tauke, Verizon’s senior vice president-public policy and external affairs. “Verizon is ready and willing to negotiate. No one in our sector will be well served by several more years of litigation and regulatory wrangling.”

Powell made his speech about a week after a federal appeals court overturned an FCC order delegating authority to state regulators to determine what parts of the local phone network the Bells must make available to competitors at government- mandated rates. Powell was among two commissioners to oppose the regulations, but a majority of commissioners want the U.S. Supreme Court to review the contested rules.

The Office of the Solicitor General within the U.S. Department of Justice is responsible for seeking an appeal before the nation’s highest court, known in legal speak as filing a petition for writ of certiorari. Brad Ramsay, general counsel of NARUC, says the Supreme Court agrees to hear seven out of 10 cases the Solicitor General files for appeal.

The National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA), which advises the White House on policies, has not made a decision on whether to recommend an appeal, according to Ranjit de Silva, director of public affairs with NTIA. A White House spokesman was not immediately available for comment.

Rep. Fred Upton (R-Mich.), chairman, subcommittee on Telecommunications and the Internet under the House Committee on Energy and Commerce, says the appeals court made the right decision by overturning the FCC’s phone regulations and upholding rules deregulating the broadband market. Upton has supported Powell’s position that it is the FCC’s job q not the charge of state regulators - to determine whether local phone companies have the right to lease Bell switches at UNE rates.

“Obviously we’d like to see the court challenges dropped and get the work done - to take the next step in broadband and telephone deregulation,” says Upton spokesman Sean Bonyun.

In speeches at the NARUC winter convention, FCC commissioners Kevin Martin and Michael Copps said the court decision has consequences extending beyond the telecommunications industry because it affects the relationship between state and federal regulators elsewhere, such as the U.S. Fish & Wildlife Service and the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission.

“In striking down any state role, the court said that you are no different than any private organization,” Martin, a Republican, told state regulators. “They said the fact that the FCC had involved state commissions rather than private organizations made no difference. In the D.C. Circuit’s eyes, you are viewed like any other lobbyist. I am troubled by their failure to recognize the traditional federal-state relationship. I think you are different; they did not.”

On March 2, the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit overturned parts of the FCC’s Triennial Review Order, which governs new phone and broadband rules. The court said the FCC was not authorized to delegate rulemaking authority to the states, and it struck down a national finding that phone companies are “impaired” without being able to lease Bell switches used to route local traffic.

Staying its decision for 60 days or no later than the denial of a petition for a rehearing, the court blasted the FCC for failing to write rules that comply with the law.

“This deadline is appropriate in light of the commission’s failure after eight years to develop lawful unbundling rules and its apparent unwillingness to adhere to prior judicial rulings,” the court said.

The day after the ruling, SBC disclosed making an offer to negotiate wholesale phone rates with AT&T, MCI and other competitors throughout its 13-state territory. State regulators set the wholesale rates based on a formula the Bells claim is severely flawed, requiring them to subsidize their rivals.

“Neither of our companies stands to benefit from continued uncertainty in the industry,” SBC Chairman and CEO Edward Whitacre wrote in a letter to AT&T’s top executive, Dave Dorman. “SBC’s offer of private negotiations would enable you to provide certainty for your business operations, and more importantly, allow your company to continue serving its customers in a fully competitive environment.”

AT&T wasn’t impressed.

“SBC’s letter provides a perfect example of the overreaching and anticompetitive nature of the activist D.C. Circuit panel decision,” AT&T spokeswoman Claudia Jones said. “For the sake of all consumers this decision needs to be stayed and reviewed by the Supreme Court.”

Links
AT&T Corp. www.att.com
BellSouth Corp. www.bellsouth.com
FCC www.fcc.gov
MCI www.mci.com
SBC Communications Inc. www.sbc.com
U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit www.cadc.uscourts.gov
Verizon Communications Inc. www.verizon.com
Tags: Agents Telephony/UC/Collaboration

Most Recent


  • Joseph Chong Enterprise Connect
    ‘Collaborate Happy’: Zoom, Google Cloud, AWS Showcase New AI, Machine Learning Tools
    “Things that are not possible are possible,” said Google Cloud at Enterprise Connect.
  • HP's Enrique Lores Amplify 2023
    Amplify 2023: HP Tackling Tough Market with ‘Realistic Optimism’
    HP CEO Enrique Lores has outlined a seven-point plan to navigate current market challenges.
  • Microsoft's Nicole Herskowitz
    ‘The Next Normal is Here’: Microsoft, Cisco, RingCentral Make the Case for Generative AI in Collaboration
    “Every decade or so a new technology emerges that is truly disruptive,” said RingCentral's president and COO.
  • Why You Should Include Audiovisual Solutions in Your UC Services
    Why You Should Include Audiovisual Solutions in Your UC Services
    By adding or diversifying UC services to include videoconferencing solutions, MSPs can generate new revenue streams and resolve more of clients’ tech challenges.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Woman with questions
    Should We Just Call Master Agents Distributors?
  • Benefit, Plus Sign
    TBI, Avant Add New Cloud, Security Suppliers to Lineups
  • CIO
    ScanSource Hires New CIO to Lead Global IT Strategy
  • Select a Hire
    Telarus Hires Megapath, Fusion Connect Vet Dan Foster as Latest CRO

Upcoming Events

View all

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

May 1, 2023 - May 4, 2023

Channel Partners Europe

June 13, 2023 - June 14, 2023

Channel Futures Leadership Summit

October 30, 2023 - November 2, 2023

Galleries

View all

Google Cloud Lashes Out at Microsoft, New Hurdle for Broadcom-VMware

March 30, 2023

National Women’s History Month: Channel Women on Getting Good Advice

March 30, 2023

Amplify 2023: HP Tackling Tough Market with ‘Realistic Optimism’

March 29, 2023

Industry Perspectives

View all

Why You Should Include Audiovisual Solutions in Your UC Services

March 28, 2023

Selling Your MSP: Strategic vs. Financial Buyers

March 22, 2023

10 Strategic Smart Enterprise Drivers for 2023

March 16, 2023

Webinars

View all

Give Customers the Power: How MSPs Can Leverage Cloud Choice

April 4, 2023

DE&I Dialogue: How the Right DE&I Initiatives Can Propel Your Business

April 5, 2023

Meet the 2023 Channel Futures Channel Influencers

April 13, 2023

White Papers

View all

6 UCaaS Reseller Challenges and How Real World Businesses Solved Them

February 1, 2023

Frost Radar: North American UCaaS Market, 2022

February 1, 2023

The Complete Guide to White-Label UCaaS for Reseller Success

February 1, 2023

Channel Futures TV

View all

Kaseya, Post-Acquisition, Expanding ‘Well-Regarded’ Datto Partner Program

Aryaka ‘Driving Value to the Channel Community’ with Throttle

March 24, 2023

Coffee with Craig and James Episode 121: Hewlett Packard Enterprise

March 23, 2023

Real-Life M&A: Advice for a Successful Channel Deal

March 13, 2023

Twitter

ChannelFutures

.@HP thanks partners, promises to reduce wait times and complexity across organization. #HPAmplify… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

.@Kyndryl #layoffs impacting a percentage of workforce. dlvr.it/SllFbF https://t.co/Bo77KdJMpx

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

[email protected] makes #DE&I a priority year-round, not just for @womenshistmonth. “A constant cadence of activism… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

📺 Tune into the latest CFTV episode, brought to you by @HitachiVantara, all about how you can identify your competi… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

“Things that are not possible are possible,” said @Google's @behshad_behzadi at #EnterpriseConnect about generative… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

📺 We asked 2023 #ChannelInfluencer @peter_kujawa from Service Leadership what his secret sauce is- his work philoso… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

.@okta rolling out redesigned partner program. #cybersecurity dlvr.it/SlkYJl https://t.co/52Wx5prcNS

March 30, 2023
ChannelFutures

Need some advice? Women in the communications and IT channel share some of the best they’ve ever received about wor… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

March 30, 2023

MSP 501

The industry's largest and most comprehensive partner awards program.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2023 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X