https://www.channelfutures.com/wp-content/themes/channelfutures_child/assets/images/logo/footer-new-logo.png
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
Channel Futures
  • NEWSLETTER
  • Home
  • Technologies
    • Back
    • SDN/SD-WAN
    • Cloud
    • RMM/PSA
    • Security
    • Telephony/UC/Collaboration
    • Cable
    • Mobility & Wireless
    • Fiber/Ethernet
    • Data Centers
    • Backup & Disaster Recovery
    • IoT
    • Desktop
    • Artificial Intelligence
    • Analytics
  • Strategy
    • Back
    • Mergers and Acquisitions
    • Channel Research
    • Business Models
    • Distribution
    • Technology Solutions Brokerages
    • Sales & Marketing
    • Best Practices
    • Vertical Markets
    • Regulation & Compliance
  • MSP 501
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501 Rankings
    • 2022 NextGen 101 Rankings
  • Intelligence
    • Back
    • Galleries
    • Podcasts
    • From the Industry
    • Reports/Digital Issues
    • Webinars
    • White Papers
  • Channel Futures TV
  • EMEA
  • Channel Chatter
    • Back
    • People on the Move
    • New/Changing Channel Programs
    • New Products & Services
    • Industry Honors
  • Resources
    • Back
    • Advisory Boards
    • Industry Organizations
    • Our Sponsors
    • Advertise
    • 2022 Editorial Calendar
  • Awards
    • Back
    • 2022 MSP 501
    • Channel Influencers
    • Circle of Excellence
    • DE&I 101
    • Channel Partners 101 (CP 101)
  • Events
    • Back
    • CP Conference & Expo
    • MSP Summit
    • Channel Partners Europe
    • Channel Partners Event Coverage
    • Webinars
    • Industry Events
  • About Us
  • DE&I
    • Newsletter
  • REGISTER
  • MSPs
  • VARs / SIs
  • Agents
  • Cloud Service Providers
  • Channel Partners Events
 Channel Futures

Technologies


Apple, Samsung, Phones and Software Patents: An Historical Perspective

  • Written by Christopher Tozzi
  • September 22, 2015

Last week's court ruling in favor of Apple, which granted an injunction against Samsung's sale of phones with "slide to unlock" features, shows that old nuisances—specifically, software patents—die hard in the technology world. It's also a reminder of how the history of Apple and software patents remains remarkably relevant in the present.

Last week's court ruling in favor of Apple (AAPL), which granted an injunction against Samsung's sale of phones with "slide to unlock" features, shows that old nuisances—specifically, software patents—die hard in the technology world. It's also a reminder of how the history of Apple and software patents remains remarkably relevant in the present.

In the case, the United States Court of Appeals ruled that certain of Samsung's phones, including the Galaxy S3, violate software patents belonging to Apple. By a 2-1 vote, the judges ordered Samsung to cease selling phones with patented features.

That does not necessarily mean the company has to shelve its existing products. It is free simply to modify them by removing the infringing features. Moreover, the court decision is unlikely to have a major impact on the marketplace, since the devices involved are now several years old.

Still, this outcome underscores just how much force software patents continue to hold in the technology world—and how important they are to companies such as Apple, which seek to maximize profits by minimizing the sharing of ideas between developers.

Software Copyright, Software Patents and Apple

To understand the full context of the lawsuit, it's worth briefly surveying the history of software patents and how Apple has used them in the past.

When software patents appeared in the early decades of computing, they were a radically new idea. Initially, companies had relied on copyrights to limit the extent to which competitors could copy their software. Copyrights protected only code itself. Unless a company could show in court that a competitor had stolen its code, it couldn't prove copyright infringement.

Software patents go much further than copyrights. Patents restrict reproductions of the "look and feel" of a software program. They can make copies of an application's features or interface illegal, even if no code theft occurs.

For companies interested in stifling competition, software patents are a great thing. But they're bad for rapid innovation, since they prevent developers from borrowing good ideas from one another—even if they implement those ideas using original code.

Software patents also give rise to plenty of ambiguity in the courtroom. Unlike copyright cases, in which it is usually simple enough to prove that code either was or was not illegally copied from one program into another by comparing the source code, patents involve a lot of gray area. Determining whether a patent violation has occurred requires subjective interpretation of how similar the look and feel of one program can be to that of another without violating a patent.

Apple's history of using software patents against competitors stretches back to the 1980s. In that decade, the company launched a lawsuit against Hewlett-Packard (HPQ) and Microsoft (MSFT), claiming that the companies had violated patents by copying the look and feel of Apple interfaces in their own products.

Apple eventually lost the case, with the court ruling that the idea behind a desktop computer interface is too broad and general to be subject to a software patent. Nonetheless, the lawsuit engendered a lot of ill will within the software world during the years it raged. It prompted Richard Stallman's GNU project, for example—hardly a natural friend of Microsoft or HP, but an organization that was nonetheless willing to support those companies in this situation—to call for a boycott of Apple.

Stallman and his supporters also launched a "Keep Your Lawyers Off My Computer" campaign, featuring a button depicting Apple as a snake, that aimed to raise awareness of the dangers software patents posed.

Historically, the dismissal of Apple's claims against Microsoft and HP, along with the failure of similar cases in the 1980s and 1990s, made software patents less threatening to programmers interested in innovation. The injunction last week against Samsung, however, shows that the specter of patent challenges has not disappeared.

That's a bad thing for both developers and end users. By preventing the sharing of ideas, courts that uphold software patents make it more difficult for engineers and programmers to create useful devices. At the same time, they make products expensive and less useful for consumers.

Software patents are good for Apple, which has become wildly successful by building a monopolistic ecosystem in which it alone is the major purveyor of both hardware and software. It's harmful for anyone in favor of technology that is as useful and affordable as it can possibly be, unencumbered by artificial barriers to innovation like software patents.

Tags: Agents Cloud Service Providers MSPs VARs/SIs Technologies

Most Recent


  • Black Hat expo hall 2022
    The Gately Report: Black Hat USA Edition with Cisco, IBM, CISA, More
    Black Hat USA has come roaring back since the COVID-19 pandemic.
  • Making Waves
    7 Channel People Making Waves This Week at Microsoft, Rackspace, RingCentral, Avaya
    Hackers targeted one UCaaS firm by impersonating the company's IT department.
  • Hired
    Former CenturyLink, Spearhead Channel Leader Joins Equinix
    Equinix conducted about 30% of its business through partners a year ago and has vowed to increase that number.
  • Welcome Mat
    Okta Names Splunk Vet New Global Channel Chief
    Okta's global channel chief left the company in June.

One comment

  1. Avatar Anonymous September 22, 2015 @ 1:27 pm
    Reply

    Why is it “innovation” for
    Why is it “innovation” for Samsung to copy, say, slide to unlock, and bad (for innovation!) that they are forced to come up with their own (possibly better) approach?

    Also, what does any of this have to do with software patents? These are system patents. Software case law is about algorithms.

Leave a comment Cancel reply

-or-

Log in with your Channel Futures account

Alternatively, post a comment by completing the form below:

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Content

  • Welcome Mat
    Ex-Telarus Exec Scott Forbush Leaves Upstack for PPT Solutions After 5 Months
  • Ransomware skull and crossbones
    JBS Did What it 'Needed to Do' with $11 Million Ransom Payment
  • hybrid clouds
    Nutanix, HPE Team on Hybrid, Multicloud via GreenLake
  • lone Arctic wolf
    Arctic Wolf Enhances Partner Program with 2 New Tiers

Upcoming Events

View all

MSP Summit

September 13, 2022 - September 16, 2022

Channel Partners Conference & Expo

May 1, 2023 - May 4, 2023

Galleries

View all

The Gately Report: Black Hat USA Edition with Cisco, IBM, CISA, More

August 12, 2022

7 Channel People Making Waves This Week at Microsoft, Rackspace, RingCentral, Avaya

August 12, 2022

Oracle Cloud & AT&T, AWS Lead Cloud News Roundup

August 12, 2022

Industry Perspectives

View all

How to Take Shared Responsibility for Securing Cloud

August 11, 2022

Seize the Application Modernization Opportunity

August 2, 2022

A Growth Mindset: Your Organization’s Strategic Differentiator

August 1, 2022

Webinars

View all

Outsmarting RaaS: Implementation Strategies To Help Your Clients Before, During, and After a Ransomware Attack

August 23, 2022

Why it is Important to Upgrade Aging Servers and How to use Live Optics to Upgrade Efficiently

August 25, 2022

Executives at Home are Not Alright: An Intro to Digital Executive Protection

September 8, 2022

White Papers

View all

Work Goes Remote – (and Other Top ITOps Trends)

May 25, 2022

The New Bottom Line: How MSPs Can Meet the Healthcare Crisis While Evolving Their Businesses

April 19, 2022

How to build a Security Operations Center (on a budget)

April 4, 2022

Channel Futures TV

View all

ThreatLocker Preaches Zero Trust, Addresses Industry Competition

ScienceLogic Debuts New Partner Portal

August 9, 2022

Vonage a ‘Single Communications Stack Provider’ for Partners, Customers

June 27, 2022

IBM, Partners and the $1 Trillion Hybrid Cloud Opportunity

June 26, 2022

Twitter

ChannelFutures

.@splunk vet Bill Hustad named @Okta's new #channelchief. dlvr.it/SWXmws https://t.co/ILQesul0Cz

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

The Gately Report: #BHUSA edition with @Hacker0x01, @Cisco, @SaltSecurity, @CISAgov, @ExtraHop, @IBMSecurity, more.… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

Channel People Making Waves Include: @kencarnesi, @szebenisz, @vasujakkal, @brettsmith52, @DaveMichels… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

Nancy Henriquez, VP of Sales & Marketing at MSP 501 award-winning @synetek, touches on the importance of gathering… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

.@Equinix's new hire is a familiar face in the telco channel. dlvr.it/SWXV6v https://t.co/jIg0LrZ4DO

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

Missed the news this week from @OracleCloud and @ATTBusiness? We've got it here. Plus, news from @AWSCloud and… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

Huge channel-impacting acquisitions in the past month. We've got details on @IBM, @nokia, @GoTo, @EnsonoIT,… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022
ChannelFutures

Boost privacy by design with #shiftleft mindset and add #security to cloud deployments from start, says… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…

August 12, 2022

MSP 501

The industry's largest and most comprehensive partner awards program.

Newsletters and Updates

Sign up for The Channel Report, Channel Futures Update, MSP 501 Newsletter and more.

Live Channel Events

Get the latest information on the next industry-leading Channel Partners event.

Galleries

Educational slide shows and images from live events.

Media Kit And Advertising

Want to reach our audience? Access our media kit.

DISCOVER MORE FROM INFORMA TECH

  • Channel Partners Events
  • Telecoms.com
  • MSP 501
  • Black Hat
  • IoT World Today
  • Omdia

WORKING WITH US

  • Contact
  • About Us
  • Advertise
  • Newsletter

FOLLOW Channel Futures ON SOCIAL

  • Privacy
  • CCPA: “Do Not Sell My Data”
  • Cookie Policy
  • Terms
Copyright © 2022 Informa PLC. Informa PLC is registered in England and Wales with company number 8860726 whose registered and Head office is 5 Howick Place, London, SW1P 1WG.
This website uses cookies, including third party ones, to allow for analysis of how people use our website in order to improve your experience and our services. By continuing to use our website, you agree to the use of such cookies. Click here for more information on our Cookie Policy and Privacy Policy.
X