Holy Massive Bureaucratic Report, IP Man!
The Notice of Proposed Rulemaking and Further Notice of Proposed Rulemaking adopted Feb. 8, 2011, and released Feb. 9, 2011, is one gigantic tome. Even the rules regarding commenting require a moment or two of thought. Check out the following:
- Comment Date on Section XV: [30 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]
- Reply Comment Date on Section XV: [45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]
- Comment Date on the Remaining Sections: [45 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]; Comment Date of State Members of the Federal-State Joint Board on Universal Service: [59 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]; Reply Comment Date on Remaining Sections: [80 days after date of publication in the Federal Register]
Got it! The idea that I could read this and do my regular job was an incredible faux pas on my part. The Introduction and Executive Summary are a mind-boring 18 pages, leaving out much of the necessary detail for me to properly summarize the Notices impact. However, with over 700 relevant paragraphs, sections, and FCC member comments, it became very clear why companies pay others to read and digest these documents. Therefore, I have discovered I am not up to the task.
Obviously, the Notice identifies certain changes the FCC would like to make to the process of funding the Universal Service Fund (USF) and the role of the federal government and the states. To that end, the key element is to eliminate both the USF and InterCarrier Compensation (ICC) and create a new fund, the Connect America Fund (CAF). No wonder these guys were unanimous for the first time in ages; they now have a chance to create a whole new mess. OK, that wasnt fair. Some of the suggested rules look promising. It would be good to end incentives for Traffic Pumping or Access Stimulation. One rule change would be to replace the current per minute charge with an actual cost to provide service fee.
The Notices focus is on expanding broadband to rural and underserved areas. As I have stated in previous blogs, I believe that priority is wrong. We should first ascertain and ensure that the country has competitive broadband services established for the 80 percent of the population that is most easily served. The U.S. ranks sixth among the G7 and is at risk of falling to seventh when Access, Speed and Price (ASP) are compared. This includes the broadband that is available in our cities and metropolitan areas.
The section on VoIP that will most affect Broadvox, our partners and competitors, I have not read yet. Perhaps I am afraid of reading the bad, or at least, what I consider may be bad. I will do my best to cover it on Friday. Help me IP Man!
David Byrd is vice president of marketing and sales for Broadvox, and is responsible for marketing and channel sales programs to SMBs, enterprises and carriers as well as defining the product offering. Prior to joining Broadvox, David was the vice president of Channels and Alliances for Eftia and Telcordia. As director of eBusiness Development with i2 Technologies, he developed major partnerships with many of the leaders in Internet eCommerce and supply chain management. As CEO of Planet Hollywood Online he was a pioneer in using early Internet technologies to build a branded entertainment and eCommerce website company partnered with Planet Hollywood. Having over 20 years of telecom sales and marketing experience, he has held executive positions with Hewlett-Packard, Sprint and Ericsson.