How The 2016 MSP 501 Stacks Up

In the interest of transparency and quality improvement, we decided to pull back the covers on what makes the MSP 501 the unique measurement that it is today.

The number one question we get year-after-year after publishing the MSP 501 list and study is “why do I rank where I do?”

This year we decided to eliminate the mystery. That’s right, we are revealing the methodology behind the 2016 MSP 501. For background, note that to be considered for the 2016 MSP 501, MSPs were asked to submit confidential applications complete with their 2015 financial results. To qualify for ranking, MSPs were also asked for revenue verification from a certified financial professional for the first time. Data were collected between Feb. 26, 2016 and April 22, 2016.

Now for the interesting part. Working with our partner, Clarity Channel Advisors, we gathered input from key MSPs and fellow industry thought leaders, and devised a methodology around revenue. Recognizing that not all revenue is the same—revenue from hardware resell, for example, is generally not as profitable as revenue from managed services—we weighted revenue from different go-to-market activities before making our calculation.

The weighting behind various revenue streams is presented here:

We fully expect questions to be raised and debates to follow. But in the interest of transparency and quality improvement, we decided to pull back the covers on what makes the MSP 501 the unique measurement that it is today.

Hide comments

Comments

  • Allowed HTML tags: <em> <strong> <blockquote> <br> <p>

Plain text

  • No HTML tags allowed.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
Publish